Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Jotti VS ManualTesting.dev

Compare Jotti VS ManualTesting.dev and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Jotti logo Jotti

Jottis malware scan is a free online service that enables you to scan suspicious files with several...

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups
  • Jotti Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-01
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

Jotti features and specs

  • Multiple Antivirus Engines
    Jotti uses multiple antivirus engines to scan files, increasing the likelihood of detection for various malware by leveraging different heuristics and databases.
  • Free Service
    The service is available for free, allowing users to scan files without incurring any costs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Jotti provides a straightforward and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for most users.
  • No Installation Required
    As an online tool, it doesn't require any software installation, making it convenient for users concerned about downloading additional applications.

Possible disadvantages of Jotti

  • File Size Limitations
    Jotti has a limitation on the size of files that can be uploaded, which may be restrictive for users needing to scan larger files.
  • Limited to Single Files
    Users can only scan one file at a time, which can be time-consuming if there are multiple files to check.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Since files are uploaded to an online server for scanning, there could be privacy and confidentiality concerns depending on the nature of the data.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Being an online service, Jotti requires a stable internet connection, which may be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Jotti videos

+ Add

Jotti Malware Scan

ManualTesting.dev videos

No ManualTesting.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jotti and ManualTesting.dev)

Jotti

ManualTesting.dev

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Software Development Tools
0 0%
Software Development Tools
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jotti and ManualTesting.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jotti seems to be a lot more popular than ManualTesting.dev. While we know about 13 links to Jotti, we've tracked only 1 mention of ManualTesting.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jotti mentions (13)

  • Might have gotten a virus from Dodi repacks.
    Everyone of you "pirates" should be using a image of your hard-drive to restore from. This should have been done after your windows installation, updates, drivers, OS tweaks, etc. You use the free version of Macrium Reflect, you use the "make a boot thumb drive" option with the software and it will automatically partition the USB drive for you and on the non-boot partition, you stick the image. Anytime you think... Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to not get a computer virus?
    Anything you execute, including installers, run through VirusTotal, Jotti AntiVirus, or my personal favorite: ShieldPro. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Areowitter V3.0, false positives? What do you think?
    Just scanned the apk on https://virusscan.jotti.org which also uses Ikarus and says that it's fine. Only Fortinet gives the same result. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Virus detected in official bg.battletech site docs - Google shows as "unsafe" to download - McAfee detects virus
    Let me give you a pro tip from guys doing netsec since the 90s: Get rid of 3rd party AV and use https://virusscan.jotti.org/ for suspicious downloads. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is there a site that I can upload files for virus scan?
    There is also https://virusscan.jotti.org/ but virustotal is the largest one and communicates with the companies whose scanners they use to report new threats. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jotti and ManualTesting.dev, you can also consider the following products

VirusTotal - VirusTotal is a free service that analyzes suspicious files and URLs and facilitates the quick...

Metadefender - Metadefender, by OPSWAT, allows you to quickly multi-scan your files for malware using 43 antivirus...

Hybrid-Analysis.com - Hybrid-Analysis.com is a free malware analysis service powered by payload-security.com.

URLscan.io - urlscan.io is a free service to scan and analyse websites. When a URL is submitted to urlscan.io, an automated process will browse to the URL like a regular user and record the activity that this page navigation creates.

Any.Run - ANY.RUN is an online interactive sandbox for DFIR/SOC investigations. The service gives access to fast malware analysis and detection of cybersecurity threats.

VirSCAN - VirSCAN.org-free virus scan is a free online scan service, utilizing various anti-virus programs to diagnose single files.

Loading...