Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jitterbit VS Apache Kafka

Compare Jitterbit VS Apache Kafka and see what are their differences

Jitterbit logo Jitterbit

Jitterbit is an open source integration software that helps businesses connect applications, data and systems.

Apache Kafka logo Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.
  • Jitterbit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-21
  • Apache Kafka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01

Jitterbit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Jitterbit offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of connecting applications and data sources, allowing users to quickly build, deploy, and manage integrations.
  • Pre-built Connectors
    The platform provides a wide range of pre-built connectors and templates for various applications and data sources, speeding up the integration process and minimizing the need for custom development.
  • API Management
    Jitterbit includes robust API management capabilities, enabling organizations to easily create, publish, and manage APIs, and ensuring seamless integration between different systems.
  • Hybrid Deployment Options
    Jitterbit supports both cloud-based and on-premises deployments, offering flexibility to meet different business needs and IT environments.
  • Scalability
    The platform is built to handle high volumes of data and large-scale integrations, making it suitable for growing businesses and enterprises.

Possible disadvantages of Jitterbit

  • Pricing
    Jitterbit can be expensive for small and medium-sized businesses, especially when compared to other integration platforms. The cost might be a barrier for organizations with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its intuitive interface, new users may still face a learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with integration concepts and best practices.
  • Limited Customization
    While Jitterbit comes with many pre-built connectors and templates, there might be restrictions when it comes to customizing solutions deeply tailored to specific business needs.
  • Complexity in Advanced Use Cases
    For very complex integration scenarios, Jitterbit might not be as straightforward and can require significant effort in terms of configuration and maintenance.
  • Support
    Users have reported that the customer support can be slow to respond or not as helpful as expected, potentially leading to delays in resolving issues.

Apache Kafka features and specs

  • High Throughput
    Kafka is capable of handling thousands of messages per second due to its distributed architecture, making it suitable for applications that require high throughput.
  • Scalability
    Kafka can easily scale horizontally by adding more brokers to a cluster, making it highly scalable to serve increased loads.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Kafka has built-in replication, ensuring that data is replicated across multiple brokers, providing fault tolerance and high availability.
  • Durability
    Kafka ensures data durability by writing data to disk, which can be replicated to other nodes, ensuring data is not lost even if a broker fails.
  • Real-time Processing
    Kafka supports real-time data streaming, enabling applications to process and react to data as it arrives.
  • Decoupling of Systems
    Kafka acts as a buffer and decouples the production and consumption of messages, allowing independent scaling and management of producers and consumers.
  • Wide Ecosystem
    The Kafka ecosystem includes various tools and connectors such as Kafka Streams, Kafka Connect, and KSQL, which enrich the functionality of Kafka.
  • Strong Community Support
    Kafka has strong community support and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find help and resources.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Kafka

  • Complex Setup and Management
    Kafka's distributed nature can make initial setup and ongoing management complex, requiring expert knowledge and significant administrative effort.
  • Operational Overhead
    Running Kafka clusters involves additional operational overhead, including hardware provisioning, monitoring, tuning, and scaling.
  • Latency Sensitivity
    Despite its high throughput, Kafka may experience increased latency in certain scenarios, especially when configured for high durability and consistency.
  • Learning Curve
    The concepts and architecture of Kafka can be difficult for new users to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Hardware Intensive
    Kafka's performance characteristics often require dedicated and powerful hardware, which can be costly to procure and maintain.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing Kafka's dependencies and ensuring compatibility between versions of Kafka, Zookeeper, and other ecosystem tools can be challenging.
  • Limited Support for Small Messages
    Kafka is optimized for large throughput and can be inefficient for applications that require handling a lot of small messages, where overhead can become significant.
  • Operational Complexity for Small Teams
    Smaller teams might find the operational complexity and maintenance burden of Kafka difficult to manage without a dedicated operations or DevOps team.

Jitterbit videos

Introduction to Jitterbit - The Smarter Approach to Integration

More videos:

  • Demo - Jitterbit Harmony 2-minute demo overview
  • Review - Jitterbit Cloud Data Loader for Salesforce

Apache Kafka videos

Apache Kafka Tutorial | What is Apache Kafka? | Kafka Tutorial for Beginners | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Kafka - Getting Started - Kafka Multi-node Cluster - Review Properties
  • Review - 4. Apache Kafka Fundamentals | Confluent Fundamentals for Apache Kafkaยฎ
  • Review - Apache Kafka in 6 minutes
  • Review - Apache Kafka Explained (Comprehensive Overview)
  • Review - 2. Motivations and Customer Use Cases | Apache Kafka Fundamentals

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jitterbit and Apache Kafka)
Data Integration
49 49%
51% 51
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
61 61%
39% 39
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Jitterbit and Apache Kafka. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jitterbit and Apache Kafka

Jitterbit Reviews

Top MuleSoft Alternatives for ITSM Leaders in 2025
Jitterbit Harmony iPaaS focuses on in API, EDI, and easing citizen development, backed by a predictive pricing model. It innovates based on customer feedback, though its service integrator ecosystem is not as extensive. Its roadmap aims to improve business automation and developer support, making it an attractive option for general iPaaS needs or EDI modernization.
Source: www.oneio.cloud
Top 15 MuleSoft Competitors and Alternatives
Jitterbit provides the Jitterbit Harmony API platform and API360 to help companies connect SaaS, on-prem, and cloud apps and infuse intelligence into business processes. In Dec 2022, Jitterbit was named a Leader in G2 Grid Report for EDI and iPaaS for mid-market and enterprise organizations.
13 data integration tools: a comparative analysis of the top solutions
Jitterbit Harmony, the ETL part of the platform, stands out for features such as robust connectors for established enterprise-level solutions such as SAP, Oracle Netsuite and Microsoft Dynamic. It also offers data auto-matching and cloud deployments for highly productive workflows.
Source: blog.n8n.io
Best iPaaS Softwares
Jitterbit is dedicated to accelerating innovation for our customers by combining the power of APIs, integration and artificial intelligence. Using the Jitterbit API integration platform companies can rapidly connect SaaS, on-premise and cloud applications and instantly infuse artificial intelligence into any business process. Our intuitive API creation technology enables...
Source: iotbyhvm.ooo
The 28 Best Data Integration Tools and Software for 2020
Description: Jitterbit offers cloud data integration and API transformation capabilities. The companyโ€™s main product, Jitterbit Harmony, allows organizations to design, deploy, and manage the entire integration lifecycle. The platform features a graphical interface for guided drag-and-drop configuration, integration via pre-built templates, and the ability to infuse...

Apache Kafka Reviews

Best ETL Tools: A Curated List
Debezium is an open-source Change Data Capture (CDC) tool that originated from RedHat. It leverages Apache Kafka and Kafka Connect to enable real-time data replication from databases. Debezium was partly inspired by Martin Kleppmannโ€™s "Turning the Database Inside Out" concept, which emphasized the power of the CDC for modern data pipelines.
Source: estuary.dev
Best message queue for cloud-native apps
If you take the time to sort out the history of message queues, you will find a very interesting phenomenon. Most of the currently popular message queues were born around 2010. For example, Apache Kafka was born at LinkedIn in 2010, Derek Collison developed Nats in 2010, and Apache Pulsar was born at Yahoo in 2012. What is the reason for this?
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
Apache Kafka is a highly scalable and robust messaging queue system designed by LinkedIn and donated to the Apache Software Foundation. It's ideal for real-time data streaming and processing, providing high throughput for publishing and subscribing to records or messages. Kafka is typically used in scenarios that require real-time analytics and monitoring, IoT applications,...
Source: blog.iron.io
10 Best Open Source ETL Tools for Data Integration
It is difficult to anticipate the exact demand for open-source tools in 2023 because it depends on various factors and emerging trends. However, open-source solutions such as Kubernetes for container orchestration, TensorFlow for machine learning, Apache Kafka for real-time data streaming, and Prometheus for monitoring and observability are expected to grow in prominence in...
Source: testsigma.com
11 Best FREE Open-Source ETL Tools in 2024
Apache Kafka is an Open-Source Data Streaming Tool written in Scala and Java. It publishes and subscribes to a stream of records in a fault-tolerant manner and provides a unified, high-throughput, and low-latency platform to manage data.
Source: hevodata.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Kafka seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 146 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jitterbit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Jitterbit yet. Tracking of Jitterbit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Kafka mentions (146)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jitterbit and Apache Kafka, you can also consider the following products

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform - Anypoint Platform is a unified, highly productive, hybrid integration platform that creates an application network of apps, data and devices with API-led connectivity.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Boomi - The #1 Integration Cloud - Build Integrations anytime, anywhere with no coding required using Dell Boomi's industry leading iPaaS platform.

Histats - Start tracking your visitors in 1 minute!

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

StatCounter - StatCounter is a simple but powerful real-time web analytics service that helps you track, analyse and understand your visitors so you can make good decisions to become more successful online.