Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jet Admin VS localhost.run

Compare Jet Admin VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Jet Admin logo Jet Admin

Build business apps really fast

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • Jet Admin Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10

Build custom business apps such as internal tools or client portals incredibly fast and without code. Use drag-and-drop UI components to assemble complex multi-page apps on top of any data source.

  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Jet Admin

$ Details
freemium $0.08 / Monthly (per External user, 24 USD per Internal user)
Release Date
2020 January

localhost.run

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Release Date
-

Jet Admin features and specs

  • Clean UI
    Can be used for building Customer-Facing Portals
  • Drag & Drop Interface
    Intuitive UI builder with 50+ UI pre-made components
  • Integrations
    30+ Native integrations: DBs, 3rd-party APIs, GraphQL, REST
  • CRUD
    Out-of-the-box for all the DBs, along with Filtering, Searching, Exporting, and Bulk actions

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of Jet Admin

Overall verdict

  • Jet Admin is generally considered a good choice for businesses looking to efficiently manage their data and operations through custom admin panels. Its ease of use and comprehensive features deliver significant flexibility and support automation, making it a valuable tool for many organizations.

Why this product is good

  • Jet Admin is praised for its ability to help users create powerful admin panels without any coding. It offers a wide range of integrations with popular services, a user-friendly interface, and extensive customization options which make it suitable for companies of different sizes. It also supports complex logic to handle various business workflows, which can streamline and automate many administrative tasks.

Recommended for

    Jet Admin is recommended for startups, SMEs, and large enterprises that need to build customized admin dashboards and internal tools quickly and without extensive coding knowledge. It is particularly beneficial for companies with diverse data sources and workflow automation needs.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Jet Admin videos

No-code Business App Builder

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jet Admin and localhost.run)
No Code
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Webhooks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jet Admin and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jet Admin and localhost.run

Jet Admin Reviews

We have no reviews of Jet Admin yet.
Be the first one to post

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be a lot more popular than Jet Admin. While we know about 42 links to localhost.run, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Jet Admin. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jet Admin mentions (3)

  • Internal Tools for Sqlite3
    I don't want to go the expense and setup of a managed database service. I like the concept of using sqlite3, litestream, and AWS S3 for an Internal App. I found an Internal Tools vendor Jetadmin (jetadmin.io) that lists Sqlite as a supported database. It may be that Sqlite is easily integrated with the other tools I looked at, but they don't state it. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Firefoo - A new Firestore GUI client featuring table view, JS query shell & JSON exporting
    Jetadmin.io - Firestore integration is not working well. Source: about 5 years ago
  • Django admin looks dated and is not mobile friendly, any better options ?
    Had a look at the github and subsequently the demo, I end up at jetadmin.io which by the looks of it is an interesting low-code/no-code environment. However if you use django-jet doesn't that mean you need a jetadmin account? Source: over 5 years ago

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jet Admin and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Retool - Build custom internal tools in minutes.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Appsmith - Appsmith is an open source web framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards, and workflows.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Forest Admin - Execute fast and at scale with no time wasted on internal tools developed in-house.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.