Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jelastic VS runc

Compare Jelastic VS runc and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Jelastic logo Jelastic

Jelastic is a cloud PaaS and CaaS for hosting providers, ISVs, DevOps and enterprises. It can be used for Public, Private, Hybrid and Multi-Cloud deployments.

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc
  • Jelastic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10
  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21

Jelastic features and specs

  • Scalability
    Jelastic provides automatic vertical and horizontal scaling capabilities, allowing applications to efficiently handle varying loads without manual intervention.
  • Multi-Cloud Support
    Jelastic offers multi-cloud deployment options, allowing users to choose from various cloud service providers, ensuring flexibility and redundancy.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface with a simple and intuitive setup process, making it accessible to developers with varying levels of experience.
  • Pay-per-Use Pricing
    Jelastic employs a pay-as-you-go pricing model, so users are billed based on actual resource consumption rather than pre-provisioned limits, which can cut down costs.
  • Docker and Kubernetes Support
    Jelastic supports both Docker containers and Kubernetes clusters, giving developers modern tools for orchestration and application management.

Possible disadvantages of Jelastic

  • Limited Provider Options
    While Jelastic supports multiple cloud providers, the options may not be as extensive as some other cloud platforms, limiting choice for some users.
  • Complexity in Advanced Configurations
    While basic setups are straightforward, more complex configurations can become cumbersome and may require additional expertise.
  • Vendor Lock-in Risk
    Using proprietary features specific to Jelastic may create dependencies that complicate migration to another platform if needed.
  • Variable Costs
    Although the pay-per-use model is cost-efficient, unpredictable traffic and usage patterns can lead to unforeseen expenses, making budgeting more challenging.
  • Community and Support
    Compared to larger platforms, Jelastic might have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources, which can pose a challenge for troubleshooting and support.

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

Jelastic videos

Jelastic PaaS short demo for hosting service providers

More videos:

  • Review - Why Developers Choose Jelastic
  • Review - Applications and Add-Ons Hosted in One Click via Jelastic Marketplace

runc videos

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jelastic and runc)
Cloud Computing
49 49%
51% 51
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jelastic and runc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jelastic and runc

Jelastic Reviews

  1. Tiago
    ยท PO at Atech ยท
    Tiago Neves

    Is a great tool, and the real cloud computing. The aws is very caotical to use.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Easy to use|Flexible|Super fast|Easy user interface
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Price

runc Reviews

We have no reviews of runc yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, runc should be more popular than Jelastic. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jelastic mentions (2)

  • Sourcing UK reseller hosting - large amount of sites to host
    Check out https://jelastic.com/ I've found this to be a god send with managing and deploying web servers. The website, somewhere, has a list of all the companies that use Jelastic, and their features. I'd recommend MassiveGrid (they use Equinix data centres). It's also a pay for what you use rather than a set fee each month model. It costs me about 14c/month to host a site with a few hundred visits a month. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Cloud hosting. Where my partner and I are wrong? Need your opinion.
    Based on the described case, it seems you need to check Jelastic PaaS. Iโ€™ll explain in a few details:. Source: over 4 years ago

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jelastic and runc, you can also consider the following products

Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

Cloud Foundry - Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service, providing a choice of clouds, developer frameworks and application services, making it faster and easier to build, test, deploy and scale applications from an IDE or the command line.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Engine Yard Cloud - Deploy and scale Rails applications in the cloud

LXD - Daemon based on liblxc offering a REST API to manage containers