JavaScripting VS SSL.com

• Access to a Large Library
  JavaScripting provides access to a vast collection of JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and plugins, offering developers an extensive range of tools to enhance their projects.
• Time-Saving
  Developers can save time by finding pre-existing solutions to common problems, allowing them to focus more on unique aspects of their applications.
• Community Contributions
  The platform is supported by a community of developers who contribute and update libraries, ensuring you have access to the latest tools and trends.
• Ease of Use
  JavaScripting is designed with a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of searching and accessing JavaScript libraries.

Possible disadvantages

• Quality Variability
  The quality of libraries can vary as they are community-contributed, meaning it can be challenging to find consistently high-quality or well-documented solutions.
• Dependency Management
  Using multiple third-party libraries can lead to complex dependency management, potentially causing conflicts or bloat in your project.
• Security Concerns
  Incorporating third-party libraries may introduce security vulnerabilities if libraries are not well-maintained or reviewed regularly.
• Overlapping Functionality
  The large number of available libraries can lead to redundancy, with multiple libraries offering similar functionalities, which may confuse developers choosing the right tool.

• Wide Range of Products
  SSL.com offers a broad selection of digital certificates, including SSL/TLS certificates, code signing certificates, and email certificates, catering to various security needs.
• User-Friendly Platform
  The SSL.com website is designed to be user-friendly, with straightforward navigation and easy access to information and purchasing options.
• 24/7 Customer Support
  SSL.com provides round-the-clock customer support, ensuring assistance is available whenever needed, which is particularly beneficial for resolving technical issues quickly.
• Competitive Pricing
  SSL.com offers competitively priced certificates, making them an attractive option for individuals and businesses looking for affordable security solutions.
• Strong Security Features
  Certificates from SSL.com include robust security features, ensuring data exchanged between servers and clients is encrypted and secure.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Installation for Beginners
  The installation process for SSL certificates can be complex for users unfamiliar with server configurations, potentially requiring additional guidance or support.
• Limited Basic SSL Options
  While SSL.com provides a variety of certificates, the options for basic SSL certificates might be limited compared to other providers offering more versatility in their basic packages.
• Variable Issuance Time
  The time taken to issue certificates can vary, potentially causing delays for users who require immediate implementation.

Tracking JavaScripting since Mar 2021.

• SMIME best certificate provider?

  I currently use ssl.com for a SMIME certificate which works. Emails sent to gmail for example will show the email as signed/trusted even if it's not encrypted. Source: almost 3 years ago

• acme.sh runs arbitrary commands from a remote server

  It looks like they resell ssl.com and for onion there is appendix B in CA/B BR is for handling a certificate for .onion addresses. https://www.harica.gr/ sells cert for onion too. Source: over 3 years ago

• Apple Code Signing the MeshCentral.mpkg agent file ? Anyone done this?

  I have succeeded in getting the code signing done in the Windows environment. I bought an EV cert online went through the process of signing the Mesh agent files. All is working well. However, I am finding that Apple has its own code... Source: over 3 years ago

View more