JavaScripting VS FV Player

• Access to a Large Library
  JavaScripting provides access to a vast collection of JavaScript libraries, frameworks, and plugins, offering developers an extensive range of tools to enhance their projects.
• Time-Saving
  Developers can save time by finding pre-existing solutions to common problems, allowing them to focus more on unique aspects of their applications.
• Community Contributions
  The platform is supported by a community of developers who contribute and update libraries, ensuring you have access to the latest tools and trends.
• Ease of Use
  JavaScripting is designed with a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of searching and accessing JavaScript libraries.

Possible disadvantages

• Quality Variability
  The quality of libraries can vary as they are community-contributed, meaning it can be challenging to find consistently high-quality or well-documented solutions.
• Dependency Management
  Using multiple third-party libraries can lead to complex dependency management, potentially causing conflicts or bloat in your project.
• Security Concerns
  Incorporating third-party libraries may introduce security vulnerabilities if libraries are not well-maintained or reviewed regularly.
• Overlapping Functionality
  The large number of available libraries can lead to redundancy, with multiple libraries offering similar functionalities, which may confuse developers choosing the right tool.

• Customizability
  FV Player offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to adjust the player to fit the design of their site and meet specific functional requirements.
• Responsive Design
  The player is responsive and works well on different devices and screen sizes, enhancing the viewing experience for users on mobile, tablets, and desktops.
• Compatibility
  FV Player is compatible with various video formats and platforms, including YouTube and Vimeo, allowing for versatile video content management.
• Security Features
  Provides advanced security options like domain locking and HLS encryption to protect video content.
• User-Friendly Interface
  Possesses an intuitive and easy-to-use interface which makes it accessible for users with different skill levels.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  The premium features of FV Player require a paid license, which might be a disadvantage for those with limited budgets.
• Learning Curve
  Despite its user-friendly interface, beginners might face a learning curve when trying to use some of the more advanced features.
• Limited Support for Free Version
  Free users might find the support options limited compared to those available for premium users.
• Potential Performance Issues
  On very high-traffic websites, users might experience performance issues as the player could demand significant server resources.

Tracking JavaScripting since Mar 2021.

• Wordpress Video plug in advice

  Alternatively, if this isn't doable relatively easily, perhaps the ability to stop the first video and manually start the second video at the same place the first video was recently started. I was told that Foliovision FV player may do... Source: over 4 years ago