
Scrimba
Codédex
CodeCrafters
Data Protocol
Codelita
Eloquent JavaScript
The State of JavaScript 2018
A free resource for learning and developing in JavaScript

Podchaser
Rephonic
Listen Notes
Podcast List
Pod Green Room
MillionPodcasts
Podcast Lister
Find, pitch, and book the right podcasts for your clients. Podcast outreach software for PR teams and booking agencies.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, JavaScript.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | javascript.com | podseeker.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2021 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of JavaScript.com yet.
Podseeker helps PR teams, podcast booking agencies, and experts get booked on the right podcasts. Recommendations by client fit. Start with a client profile and Podseeker recommends podcasts that fit, each with a Client Fit score and a short reason. A database built for outreach. Search by 200+...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing JavaScript.com and Podseeker.
Podseeker's answer:
Gmail and Microsoft Graph APIs for sending from your own mailbox, hosted on AWS.
Podseeker's answer:
Podseeker is built around fit, not database size. It recommends podcasts for each client by Client Fit, with a fit score and a short reason, and shows booking intelligence on every show: how selective it is, who it books, and recent episodes. Pitches go out from your own Gmail or Outlook, never automatically, and follow-ups stop when a host replies.
Podseeker's answer:
Most podcast tools are either a large database to browse or an automated sender. Podseeker connects the two around one question: which shows would want this guest? You get client-matched recommendations, host and producer contacts, personalized pitching in your own words, and reply-aware follow-ups in one place, for one plan at $99/month with 3 seats. Pitches to very high-fit podcasts booked at 6.2%, compared with 3.3% overall.
Podseeker's answer:
PR agencies, podcast booking agencies, and in-house PR teams who book clients or executives on podcasts every month. Authors, coaches, and consultants who pitch themselves use it too, and developers and AI agents use the Podcast Data API.
Podseeker's answer:
Podseeker started from a simple frustration in podcast PR: most of the time goes into finding the right shows and the right contact, and most pitches go to shows that were never a fit. We built Podseeker to fix the targeting first, then make pitching and follow-up from your own inbox simple. It's independent and bootstrapped, and we build it closely with the PR teams who use it every week.
Share your experience with using JavaScript.com and Podseeker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


The best resource I know of is Javascript.com for learning Javascript for the first time. It's made by Pluralsight which is a site that contains courses. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Tracking Podseeker since Oct 2021.
When comparing JavaScript.com and Podseeker, you can also consider the following products.

Interactive coding screencasts created in an instant
Compare Scrimba to JavaScript.com or Podseeker:




Programming exercises for experienced engineers.
Compare CodeCrafters to JavaScript.com or Podseeker:

🔍 Podcast search engine that actually works
Compare Listen Notes to JavaScript.com or Podseeker: