
Mocha
Karma
Mochajs
QUnit
Ava
Enzyme
WebdriverIO
Behavior-Driven JavaScript

KATANA
MRPEasy
Craftybase
Ekos
BrewPlanner
InnoVint
inFlow Inventory
Recipes, inventory, batch costing and lot traceability for small producers: breweries, roasters, cideries, cheesemakers and 20+ crafts. Free plan.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Jasmine seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 32 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | jasmine.github.io | batchmakes.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Jasmine yet.
BatchMakes is production software for small batch producers who have outgrown spreadsheets but don't need a big ERP. Start from a ready-made setup for your craft: brewery, cidery, winery, distillery, coffee roaster, cheesemaker, jam and preserves, honey, sauces, soap and candles, cosmetics...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of BatchMakes yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Blue Jasmine - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann
More videos
No BatchMakes videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Jasmine and BatchMakes.
BatchMakes's answer:
BatchMakes is built for small batch producers, not adapted from a general ERP. Producers can select their craft and the workspace arrives pre-set with the right production stages and measurements. It works out the true cost per can, jar or bag from what was really packaged, with losses, packaging and labels included, and suggests prices from your markup. Every lot is traceable from supplier delivery to batch to customer, ready for an inspection or recall.
BatchMakes's answer:
Next.js, React, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Prisma, Tailwind CSS, Stripe (billing), Docker and Cloudflare.
BatchMakes's answer:
Bad Banners Brewery Co.
BatchMakes's answer:
Big inventory and manufacturing tools (Katana, Unleashed, NetSuite) are built for larger operations and take weeks to set up. Generic inventory apps don’t understand batches, stages, losses or lots. BatchMakes sits in between: set up in minutes, made for how small producers really work, with a free plan for one user and Business at €59/month. It also covers what small makers usually need extra tools for: pricing per format, lot traceability, VAT invoices, excise duty for alcohol producers, and a production planner.
BatchMakes's answer:
Small batch producers with 1–10 people who have outgrown spreadsheets: craft breweries, cideries, meaderies, wineries, small distilleries, kombucha makers, coffee roasters, cheesemakers, jam and preserve makers, honey producers, sauce makers, soap and candle makers, and cosmetics makers.
BatchMakes's answer:
BatchMakes started with a simple frustration: small producers we know, brewers, jam makers and beekeepers, ran their production in spreadsheets and notebooks. They roughly knew what a batch cost, but not what one can or jar really cost after losses, packaging and labels, and a recall meant digging through paper. We built BatchMakes with them, feature by feature, so a small maker gets the same control as a big factory without the complexity.
Share your experience with using Jasmine and BatchMakes. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


In the State of JS ranking, Cypress has already surpassed some previously leading best testing frameworks, such as Jasmine, and is now ranked fourth for testing, with 35.8% of testers citing Cypress as their preferred...
We have no reviews of BatchMakes yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Apart from that, there is a lot of common ground regarding testing. All three contenders support the testing tools that many of you use and love, whether it is Jest, Jasmine, and Mocha for unit testing or Cypress, Playwright, and — of... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Greetings, another week another lab this week covered the topic of automated testing. When selecting a test framework my first thought was to use Jasmine, which I had used previously, however it turns out that Jasmine does not have good... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Tracking BatchMakes since Oct 2026.
When comparing Jasmine and BatchMakes, you can also consider the following products.

Sponsors. Use Mocha at Work? Ask your manager or marketing team if they'd help support our project. Your company's logo will also be displayed on npmjs. com and our GitHub repository.
Compare Mocha to Jasmine or BatchMakes:

Katana is an asset-based approach to VFX look development and lighting for 3D computer generated scenes, providing scalability to your pipeline.
Compare KATANA to Jasmine or BatchMakes:


Cloud-based ERP Software for Small Manufacturers (10 - 200 employees)
Compare MRPEasy to Jasmine or BatchMakes:

Mocha is a JavaScript test framework running on Node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple.
Compare Mochajs to Jasmine or BatchMakes:
