
Vanta
Drata
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 ISMS portal. Trygg reads identity, mail, endpoints, and backup controls from the systems that run them.

Vanta
Drata
Sprinto
OneTrust
Probo
Apptega
AuditBoard
Get enterprise ready with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Secureframe seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | itrygg.com | secureframe.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 | Startup from the United States |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


The Trygg portal gives leadership a live view of the company's ISO/IEC 27001 program and the security controls behind it. Instead of relying on spreadsheets, documents, screenshots, and evidence assembled before an audit, Trygg brings the management system into one working environment....
No description of Secureframe yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of iTrygg yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Secureframe is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized businesses, and enterprises seeking an efficient way to manage compliance obligations, particularly those in the technology, finance, and healthcare sectors that need to comply with strict security regulations.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing iTrygg and Secureframe.
iTrygg's answer
ISO 27001 Certification
iTrygg's answer
Most organizations do not struggle because they lack security policies, tools, or reports. They struggle because those pieces do not tell one clear story.
A policy may say MFA is required. A dashboard may show endpoint protection is deployed. A spreadsheet may say a control is implemented. An evidence folder may contain proof from six months ago. The difficult question is whether all of those things are still true today.
iTrygg's answer
It connects what the organization says it does with who is responsible for doing it and, wherever possible, evidence from the systems actually performing the work. Leadership can see where the program stands, control owners can see what they are accountable for, and auditors can follow the evidence without requiring the organization to reconstruct its security program for every audit.
iTrygg's answer
Trygg is built for the people accountable for the result and the people responsible for making it happen.
For a CEO, COO, or executive team, it answers the questions that matter most: Are we doing what we say we are doing? Where are we exposed? What needs attention? Who owns it? And can we prove it?
Those questions matter well beyond certification. They surface during customer security reviews, cyber insurance renewals, board discussions, due diligence, security incidents, and conversations with auditors.
Control leaders use Trygg to manage the processes and evidence they own. The program lead uses it to manage scope, risks, objectives, reviews, corrective actions, and the audit path. An external auditor can work from those same pages and follow the evidence supporting each control.
Everyone is working from the same information rather than maintaining separate versions of the truth for management, operations, and the auditor.
iTrygg's answer
Trygg was built around a simple idea: a security management system should reflect how the business actually operates, not just how well it can prepare for an audit.
ISO/IEC 27001 provides an excellent framework for managing information security, but too often the work behind it becomes scattered across policies, spreadsheets, screenshots, tickets, and evidence folders. Leadership sees reports. Control owners see tasks. Auditors see evidence. Too rarely are they looking at the same thing.
Trygg brings those pieces together.
We combine practical ISO/IEC 27001 expertise with technology that connects governance, risk, controls, ownership, and operational evidence. The result is a management system that is easier to understand, easier to operate, and easier to defend.
Our goal is not simply to help organizations become certified. It is to help them build a security program they can see, trust, and continuously improve.
Share your experience with using iTrygg and Secureframe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking iTrygg since Nov 2026.
Secureframe | Remote (Canada) | https://secureframe.com | 150-200k CAD Secureframe helps company get compliant and build trust with their customers. We do this by integrating in a companies core SaaS tools, ingesting data, and then... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
My org is in a position where we'll need to get SOC II or ISO 27001 certified in the next year. I've been doing some research on the easiest way to go about this, and discovered secureframe (https://secureframe.com/). It looks like it... Source: almost 4 years ago
Hi, founder of Secureframe (https://secureframe.com) here. Secureframe helps streamline compliance across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and more. There are so many accurate responses in this thread. Like many have mentioned, SOC 2 is... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
When comparing iTrygg and Secureframe, you can also consider the following products.