iTerm2 Reviews

1. KateBlanc

   over 2 years ago
   Useful

   I've had so many problems with terminal in my Mac.. thanks for this tool. It's like really useful

   👍 Pros:    Fast|Convenience|Fastest, safest, and cheapest

   👎 Cons:    None

Tiny C Compiler Reviews

iTerm2 mentions (117)

• The Ultimate Guide to a Smooth Dev Environment

  Execute commands using terminals like Windows Terminal, iTerm2, or built-in options on macOS and Linux. Customizing themes, fonts, and shortcuts can optimize your workflow. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• How I Use 4 Terminal Setups with Claude Code Agent Teams

  iTerm2 is the classic macOS terminal. It's stable, feature-rich, and supports Agent Teams split-pane mode (requires it2 CLI installation and enabling the Python API). - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• ⛓️‍💥 AI Agents broke my Dev setup

  I had a setup that worked perfectly for me, 3 screens (Actually 2 screen + Macbook Pro) One with IDE (WebStorm, Vscode and from time to time just sublime). Second with Terminal (started with iTerm2 and moved to Warp with Oh My Zsh and bunch of plugins) And last with Browser (Web or DB). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• Perfect Claude Code Notifications Setup with Tailscale and ntfy

  Claude Code comes with a notification hook. Some terminals support it natively (iTerm2, Kitty, Ghostty) but most don’t, and even when they do, it’s a system notification which is easy to miss if you step away. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Using iTerm2's new AI Chat features with Azure OpenAI

  For the longest time I've used iTerm2 as a replacement for Terminal. It's fast, it's native, it's not yet another lipstick-on-an-Electron-wrapper type of thing. Only Ghostty comes close to it, and even though it's faster and resizes better, it misses some of the features I've grown to depend on. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

Tiny C Compiler mentions (37)

• What every compiler writer should know about programmers (Anton Ertl, 2015) [pdf]

  Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are alternative compilers incomplete and can't actually compile a lot of practical programs (belying the "relatively simple program") claim? Or is the performance differential due to... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Git: Introduce Rust and announce that it will become mandatorty

  In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

• Weird Lexical Syntax

  > I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Pnut: A C to POSIX Shell Compiler you can Trust

  "Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC

  For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago