iTerm2
MobaXterm
PuTTY
KiTTY
ConEmu
GNOME Terminal
Gnome Terminator
PowerShell
Headscale
TailScale
NetBird
Netmaker
ZeroTier
WireGuard
zrok
ngrok
I've had so many problems with terminal in my Mac.. thanks for this tool. It's like really useful
Based on our record, iTerm2 should be more popular than Headscale. It has been mentiond 118 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I moved off iTerm2 because I wanted a terminal that was fast and, more importantly, one whose entire appearance I could describe in text. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
Execute commands using terminals like Windows Terminal, iTerm2, or built-in options on macOS and Linux. Customizing themes, fonts, and shortcuts can optimize your workflow. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
iTerm2 is the classic macOS terminal. It's stable, feature-rich, and supports Agent Teams split-pane mode (requires it2 CLI installation and enabling the Python API). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
I had a setup that worked perfectly for me, 3 screens (Actually 2 screen + Macbook Pro) One with IDE (WebStorm, Vscode and from time to time just sublime). Second with Terminal (started with iTerm2 and moved to Warp with Oh My Zsh and bunch of plugins) And last with Browser (Web or DB). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Claude Code comes with a notification hook. Some terminals support it natively (iTerm2, Kitty, Ghostty) but most don’t, and even when they do, it’s a system notification which is easy to miss if you step away. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
You can own the control plane. If that worries you, run Headscale, an open source implementation of the Tailscale control server, or use NetBird as an alternative mesh. More work, less reliance on one company. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
> Did you try Headscale? https://github.com/juanfont/headscale or netbird? Am aware of them but IIRC they are both unaudited which kind of brings us back to square one ? We would still end up running them at arms-length as we do with Tailscale at the moment. Also isn't Headscale server-side only ? - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Did you try Headscale? https://github.com/juanfont/headscale or netbird? The latter has been great for me. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
You'll need a config.yaml (server URL, IP ranges, DERP settings) — grab the template from the Headscale repo. Point your Tailscale clients at your server with tailscale up --login-server=https://your-domain, and you have a private mesh with nobody else in the loop. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Headscale is a self-hosted, open-source implementation of the Tailscale control plane. Same WireGuard mesh, same clients — but your data stays on your infrastructure. If you're already running k3s with ArgoCD, adding Headscale is straightforward. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more
TailScale - Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.
PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.
NetBird - Connect your devices into a single secure private WireGuard®-based mesh network with SSO/MFA and manage access with just a few clicks.
KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.
Netmaker - Netmaker automates mesh VPN's and software-defined networks using WireGuard.