Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

iTerm2 VS Boxes.dev

Compare iTerm2 VS Boxes.dev and see what are their differences

iTerm2 logo iTerm2

A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

Boxes.dev logo Boxes.dev

Run Claude Code and Codex in your own cloud environment
  • iTerm2 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-29
Not present

iTerm2 features and specs

  • Versatility
    iTerm2 supports a wide range of features such as split panes, multiple tab management, and hotkey-activated terminal windows, making it highly versatile for different workflows.
  • Customization
    Offers extensive customization options, including themes, color schemes, and key bindings, allowing users to tailor the terminal to their preferences.
  • Advanced Features
    Includes advanced functionality like instant replay, which allows users to rewind their terminal session, and integration with automation tools like AppleScript.
  • Performance
    Designed to be efficient and responsive, ensuring it performs well even with multiple sessions and tabs open simultaneously.
  • Integrations
    Seamless integration with macOS features such as native notifications, fullscreen mode, and support for external editors.
  • Community Support
    Active community and comprehensive documentation, which can be very helpful for troubleshooting and learning advanced configurations.

Possible disadvantages of iTerm2

  • Mac-Only
    iTerm2 is exclusive to macOS, which means users on other operating systems cannot utilize its features.
  • Complexity
    The sheer number of features and customization options can be overwhelming for beginners, requiring a learning curve to utilize efficiently.
  • System Resource Usage
    iTerm2 may consume more system resources compared to simpler terminal emulators, which could be a concern on lower-end hardware.
  • Update Frequency
    Occasional updates can introduce bugs or unexpected behavior, requiring users to adjust settings or find workarounds.

Boxes.dev features and specs

  • Instant macOS Development Environments
    Boxes.dev allows developers to quickly spin up macOS virtual machines for development purposes, significantly reducing the time needed to set up clean development environments compared to manual configuration.
  • Native Apple Silicon Support
    Boxes.dev is built to run natively on Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4) Macs, leveraging the Apple Virtualization framework for near-native performance without the overhead of traditional emulation.
  • Easy to Use Interface
    The app provides a streamlined, user-friendly interface for creating and managing macOS virtual machines, making virtualization accessible even to developers who aren't familiar with complex VM tooling.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    Boxes.dev offers the ability to create environments with development tools pre-installed or easily configurable, saving developers significant setup time when they need fresh or isolated macOS instances.
  • Snapshot and Restore Capabilities
    Users can take snapshots of their virtual machines and restore them to previous states, which is invaluable for testing, CI/CD workflows, and safely experimenting with system configurations without risk.

Possible disadvantages of Boxes.dev

  • macOS Only
    Boxes.dev is limited to macOS host machines and macOS guest VMs, making it unsuitable for developers who need to run Linux or Windows virtual machines or who work on non-Apple hardware.
  • Paid Software
    Boxes.dev is a commercial product that requires a purchase, which may be a barrier for individual developers or small teams, especially when free alternatives like UTM or raw QEMU exist.
  • Apple Silicon Requirement
    The app primarily targets Apple Silicon Macs, which means developers still using older Intel-based Macs may have limited functionality or may not be able to use the tool at all.
  • Relatively New Product
    As a relatively newer entrant in the virtualization space, Boxes.dev has a smaller community and fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations compared to established tools like Parallels or VMware Fusion.
  • Limited OS Version Support
    Users are generally limited to running macOS versions that Apple's Virtualization framework supports as guests, which can restrict the ability to test on older macOS versions that may still be relevant for compatibility testing.

Analysis of iTerm2

Overall verdict

  • iTerm2 is regarded as an excellent terminal emulator for macOS due to its robust feature set and usability, making it a top choice for power users.

Why this product is good

  • iTerm2 is often praised for its advanced features, customization options, and efficiency that enhance productivity for users who work with the command line frequently. It offers split panes, hotkey window, undo close, instant replay, and a highly configurable interface that caters to power users, making it a versatile tool for developers and system administrators.

Recommended for

  • Developers and programmers who need a highly customizable terminal.
  • System administrators who require powerful scripting and automation capabilities.
  • Users who frequently work with command-line interfaces and require multiple sessions handled efficiently.
  • Anyone seeking an enhanced, feature-rich alternative to the default macOS terminal.

Analysis of Boxes.dev

Overall verdict

  • Boxes.dev appears to be a solid developer-focused tool that streamlines workflows, though its overall value depends on your specific technical needs and team size.

Why this product is good

  • Developer-centric design that integrates smoothly into existing coding workflows
  • Aims to reduce setup and configuration overhead so teams can focus on building
  • Modern, clean interface that appeals to technical users
  • Potential for improved collaboration and faster project spin-up

Recommended for

  • Software developers and engineering teams looking to simplify their tooling
  • Startups needing to move quickly with minimal infrastructure setup
  • Technical users who value streamlined, code-first workflows
  • Small to mid-sized teams seeking better collaboration on development projects

iTerm2 videos

Customizing iterm2 with ZSH and PowerLevel9k | Z shell Tutorial

Boxes.dev videos

No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iTerm2 and Boxes.dev)
Developer Tools
96 96%
4% 4
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
AI
0 0%
100% 100
Terminal
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using iTerm2 and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare iTerm2 and Boxes.dev

iTerm2 Reviews

  1. Useful

    I've had so many problems with terminal in my Mac.. thanks for this tool. It's like really useful

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Fast|Convenience|Fastest, safest, and cheapest
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    None

MobaXterm for Mac: Best Alternatives to MobaXterm for Mac
You can choose a Hotkey and register it as a shortcut to open the iTerm2. When you are using other application, just press the Hotkey and it will bring iTerm (terminal) to the foreground of your screen. So the iTerm2 is the best alternative to MobaXterm for Mac which will be always available for you.
30 best PuTTY alternatives for SSH clients for 2020
The iTerm2 system is available for Macs. Specifically, the program can run on Mac OS 10.10 and higher. This interface shows different terminal sessions through a split screen method, allowing you to tile sessions side by side. To lessen confusion, the active panel shows in full resolution, while the others dimmed. You can set up keyboard shortcuts to navigate through the...

Boxes.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Boxes.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iTerm2 seems to be a lot more popular than Boxes.dev. While we know about 118 links to iTerm2, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Boxes.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iTerm2 mentions (118)

View more

Boxes.dev mentions (2)

  • Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
    Devin Automations is the most obvious one: solid UX, but can get very expensive to run. There are also a bunch of newer startups in this space. I'm building one myself, https://boxes.dev -- we're very early but building for this exact use case. Some other ones worth a look are Factory Droid and Amp Orbs. Those two build their own agent harness (like Cursor), whereas with boxes.dev we run the native codex and... - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • Mitchellh starts a new company: Superlogical
    These tools all assume you have machines to run the agents on. But for parallel agents I'm pretty convinced you want each agent on its own isolated devbox running your dev environment (not e.g. Worktrees on one box) - which isn't trivial to set up and manage. I'm working this with https://boxes.dev - a workspace for launching and managing claude + codex sessions, each running in its own cloud devbox. We launched... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iTerm2 and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

Codesphere - Deploy in less than 5s

PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

AppWizzy - Build scalable web apps and websites with AI that serve you for years. Professional vibe-coding platform. Perfect to build SaaS, intenal tool, AI tool, business app, etc

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

InstaVM - Instant computers for AI agents