Software Alternatives & Startups

iTerm VS Hyper

Compare iTerm VS Hyper and see what are their differences

iTerm

iTerm is a full featured terminal emulation program written for OS X using Cocoa.

Rating
0 reviews
Hyper

Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hyper seems to be a lot more popular than iTerm. While we know about 47 links to Hyper, we've tracked only 1 mention of iTerm.

social mentions
1 vs 47
SSH popularity
35% vs 65%
alternatives listed
103 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

iTerm
Hyper
Website iterm.sourceforge.net hyper.is
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

iTerm 5 features
Hyper 5 features
  • Multiple Tabs and Panes
    iTerm allows users to open multiple tabs and split panes, increasing productivity and making it easier to manage multiple sessions.
  • Customizability
    Users can extensively customize iTerm, from changing themes and colors to creating profiles and personalized shortcuts.
  • Search and Highlighting
    iTerm provides powerful search features, including the ability to highlight matches, which can help users quickly find information within terminal outputs.
  • Scripting Support
    iTerm supports AppleScript and Python scripting, which allows users to automate tasks and integrate with other applications.
  • Persistent Sessions
    This feature enables users to maintain session states, allowing them to resume work exactly where they left off, even after restarting applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    The vast number of features in iTerm might be overwhelming for new users or those who prefer simpler terminal applications.
  • Resource Usage
    iTerm can consume more resources compared to simpler terminal applications, which might be a concern for users with limited computing power.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features, iTerm requires a certain amount of time and effort to learn to fully utilize its capabilities.
  • MacOS Exclusive
    iTerm is only available for MacOS, which excludes users on other operating systems who might want to use it.
  • Cross-Platform
    Hyper is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Extensibility
    Hyper is built on web technologies like JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, allowing users to customize and extend it with plugins and themes easily.
  • Modern UI
    It offers a sleek and modern user interface that is visually appealing and user-friendly.
  • Performance
    Despite being built on Electron, Hyper's performance is generally satisfactory for the majority of terminal tasks.
  • Ecosystem
    A rich ecosystem of plugins and themes is available, which enhances the terminal's functionality and customization options.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Usage
    As an Electron-based application, Hyper can consume more memory and CPU compared to more lightweight terminal emulators.
  • Startup Time
    Hyper may have a slower startup time compared to native terminal applications because it initializes a lot of components at launch.
  • Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with web development technologies, customizing and extending Hyper might be challenging.
  • Stability
    Occasional bugs and crashes can occur, especially when using numerous plugins or custom configurations.
  • Native Feature Gaps
    Some of the features available in native terminal emulators might be missing or less optimized in Hyper.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

iTerm
Hyper

Overall verdict

  • iTerm is generally considered a robust and versatile terminal emulator, especially favored among macOS users who require advanced features and customizability. Its comprehensive set of tools makes it a solid choice for power users who need more than the basic Terminal app.

Why this product is good

  • iTerm is a popular terminal emulator for macOS that provides users with a range of features such as split panes, search functionality, autocomplete, and support for various text encodings. It is customizable, supports profiles, and has features like instant replay and paste history, which can enhance productivity for developers and system administrators.

Recommended for

    iTerm is recommended for software developers, system administrators, and IT professionals who work extensively on the command line and require advanced features like split windows, custom key bindings, and session management. It is also suitable for users who value flexibility and customizability in their terminal applications.

Overall verdict

  • Hyper is a good choice for users who value customization and a visually appealing interface over performance. While it may not match the speed and efficiency of native terminal applications, its flexibility and design appeal to those who are comfortable with and prefer Electron-based applications.

Why this product is good

  • Hyper is an electron-based terminal that is highly customizable, allowing users to enhance its functionality through plugins and themes. It's built with web technologies, making it easy for developers familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to contribute and modify. This enables a rich ecosystem of community contributions, offering users a wide variety of enhancements to tailor the terminal experience to their needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer a customizable terminal environment
  • Users who enjoy experimenting with plugins and themes
  • Individuals who prioritize design and aesthetics in their tooling

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

iTerm 3 videos + Add
Hyper 3 videos + Add

I Dumped iTerm for Warp, Should You?

More videos

  • - Productive MacOS Terminal Setup with Vim, Iterm2, and Oh My Zsh
  • - Alacritty vs iTerm vs Terminal vs Hyper

Motorola One Hyper Review

More videos

  • - SKECHERS GOrun RAZOR 3 HYPER & GOrun 7 HYPER REVIEW | The Ginger Runner
  • - Motorola One Hyper "Real Review"

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
iTerm
Hyper
35% 35%
SSH
65% 65%
8% 8%
92% 92%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using iTerm and Hyper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

iTerm no reviews yet
Hyper no reviews yet

We have no reviews of iTerm yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

iTerm 1 mention
Hyper 47 mentions
  • Why Does The Business Care? with Michael Heap
    Michael: Terminal-wise, it's iTerm2. There are lots of new ones that I like the idea of things like Fig. But I've just used iTerm for so long that that's my go-to. Use Zsh as your shell. Don't go for something like Oh My Zsh as a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • A Fig That Works Anywhere — FaiTerm
    This was Fig's smartest move. Every other approach at the time either forced you onto a brand-new terminal emulator (Warp, Tabby) or left you stuck with the weak completion of the day. Fig chose to piggyback instead — it supported macOS... - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • Ratty – A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics
    Or Terminal is already a full featured web browser? https://hyper.is/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Hyper – Standards first React alternative
    I wish open-source projects checked to see if other projects share the same name. Especially since there are packages in NPM already about hyper. https://hyper.is/ has been around for a while and is kind of big. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to iTerm and Hyper

When comparing iTerm and Hyper, you can also consider the following products.