
Shardnet.app
Nextcloud Files
secure file sharing
SharedFiles.co
SharedSafe
Sharrr
Storj Object Storage
Share files using IPFS directly from your device — no cloud needed.
Application and Data, Libraries, and JavaScript Framework Components

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Ember-cli seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
E
Ember-cli
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | share.ipfs.io | cli.emberjs.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using IPFS Share and Ember-cli. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Tracking IPFS Share since Apr 2024.
The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago
When comparing IPFS Share and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.

Chat, store and share files without servers. Encrypted on your device, split across the network. No accounts. Storage nodes see only opaque ciphertext.
Compare Shardnet.app to IPFS Share or Ember-cli:

Nextcloud gives you access to your data and communication wherever you are.
Compare Nextcloud Files to IPFS Share or Ember-cli:
share files from your terminal with end-to-end encryption.
Compare secure file sharing to IPFS Share or Ember-cli:

Storing files on a decentralized network: Security, privacy, and more!
Compare SharedFiles.co to IPFS Share or Ember-cli:

Encryption and synchronization for your Online Storage.
Compare SharedSafe to IPFS Share or Ember-cli:
