Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Make.com VS StreamSets

Compare Make.com VS StreamSets and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

StreamSets logo StreamSets

StreamSets provides Continuous Ingest technology for the next generation of big data applications.
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • StreamSets Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platformโ€™s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

StreamSets features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    StreamSets provides an intuitive and visually appealing interface for designing and managing data pipelines, making it accessible even for users without extensive coding experience.
  • Real-Time Data Processing
    The platform excels at real-time data ingestion, transformation, and delivery, enabling timely insights and immediate actions on streaming data.
  • Comprehensive Connectors
    StreamSets supports a wide range of data sources and destinations out of the box, including cloud services, databases, and big data platforms, ensuring versatility in data integration tasks.
  • Data Drift Management
    It offers robust features for detecting and managing data drift, helping maintain data quality and consistency over time as source schemas evolve.
  • Scalability
    StreamSets is designed to scale effortlessly with increasing data volumes and can handle large-scale data pipelines efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of StreamSets

  • Cost
    The pricing model can be expensive, particularly for small to mid-sized enterprises, making it less accessible for organizations with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, mastering the platform's advanced features and configurations may require a significant learning curve.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running StreamSets can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial computational and memory resources, which may lead to higher operational costs.
  • Limited Custom Scripting
    While StreamSets offers many in-built functionalities, it provides limited scope for custom scripting compared to other data pipeline tools, which may restrict flexibility for complex custom tasks.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    For cloud-based deployments, the performance and reliability of StreamSets can be heavily dependent on internet connectivity, which could be a concern for organizations with unstable connections.

Analysis of Make.com

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Make.com is considered a good platform for those looking to streamline processes and improve efficiency through automation. Its flexible and powerful features cater to a wide range of needs, although there may be a learning curve for those new to automation or with limited technical knowledge.

Why this product is good

  • Make.com, formerly known as Integromat, is a popular platform for automating workflows and integrating various software tools. It offers a visual interface that allows users to connect different applications and automate repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity. Its ability to create complex multi-step automations with various conditions and triggers makes it a robust tool for both small businesses and larger enterprises.

Recommended for

  • small business owners
  • project managers
  • IT professionals
  • digital marketers
  • anyone looking to automate tasks without extensive coding knowledge

Analysis of StreamSets

Overall verdict

  • Yes, StreamSets is considered to be a good option for organizations seeking a comprehensive data integration and pipeline management solution. Its ability to support complex data workflows and provide detailed insights into data processing makes it a valuable tool for data engineers and IT operations teams.

Why this product is good

  • StreamSets is regarded positively due to its user-friendly interface and robust data integration features. It supports a wide range of data sources, providing flexibility for diverse data workflows. The platform is designed to handle both batch and streaming data, which is essential for organizations looking to manage real-time data processing and automation effectively. Additionally, StreamSets offers strong data observability features, which help in monitoring and optimizing data pipelines.

Recommended for

  • Organizations that require both batch and real-time data processing
  • Data engineers seeking a versatile and intuitive pipeline management tool
  • Companies looking to improve data observability and pipeline monitoring
  • Businesses with diverse data sources that need seamless integration

Make.com videos

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

StreamSets videos

What is StreamSets Transformer?

More videos:

  • Review - Making Apache Kafka Dead Easy With StreamSets | DZone.com Webinar
  • Review - Power Your Delta Lake with Streaming Transactional Changes - Rupal Shah (StreamSets)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and StreamSets)
Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration And Delivery
Workflow Automation
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and StreamSets. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and StreamSets

Make.com Reviews

Best Zapier alternatives for technical teams in 2026
If you want the strongest option for technical control, start with n8n. If you want a more flexible but still approachable managed platform, test Make. If the decision is broader than one direct replacement, compare the category through AI automation tools and n8n vs Zapier.
Autonomous Automation Platforms: Aident VS n8n VS Make
Aident AI is the leading autonomous automation platform for users who prefer building workflows through natural language conversation rather than complex visual maps. While n8n and Make serve developers and visual thinkers with powerful node-based editors, Aident's agentic engine eliminates the steep learning curve by compiling plain English instructions into executable...
Source: aident.ai
The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com

StreamSets Reviews

We have no reviews of StreamSets yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, StreamSets seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

StreamSets mentions (2)

  • Best way to automate JSON to CSV/Relational Tables at scale? Anyone have used Flexter?
    If you would like to take a look at https://streamsets.com/ the Data Collector product can handle this for you as well as dynamically generate the target tables. It has a number of functions to handle your JSON no matter the complexity. However, given the dynamic nature it may benefit to touch base so please feel free to chat or message me. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Data engineering in reality
    StreamSets offers a free tier and free option for training. You can build, run, and manage your pipelines in one place. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and StreamSets, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Packer - Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.