Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Make.com VS Sourcegraph for GitHub

Compare Make.com VS Sourcegraph for GitHub and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

Sourcegraph for GitHub logo Sourcegraph for GitHub

Browse and search GitHub like an IDE
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • Sourcegraph for GitHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-14

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platform’s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

Sourcegraph for GitHub features and specs

  • Enhanced Code Search
    Sourcegraph offers powerful code search capabilities, allowing users to search across multiple repositories and find specific code snippets quickly.
  • Seamless Integration
    It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, providing a more cohesive experience for developers who rely on GitHub for version control.
  • Cross-repository Navigation
    Sourcegraph enables users to navigate across repositories, which is particularly useful for projects that span multiple codebases.
  • Code Intelligence
    Provides code intelligence features such as hover tooltips and go-to-definition, improving the understanding of large and complex codebases.
  • Collaboration Features
    Sourcegraph enhances collaboration by allowing teams to share links to code, improving communication and code review processes.

Possible disadvantages of Sourcegraph for GitHub

  • Performance Issues
    Some users may experience performance lags, especially when dealing with large repositories or complex codebases.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may face a learning curve to utilize all the features effectively, which may deter those looking for a quick setup.
  • Limited Offline Access
    Sourcegraph primarily functions online, making it less useful for developers working in environments with limited internet connectivity.
  • Dependency on Browsers
    Being a browser-based extension, it may lack some of the features available in standalone code editors or IDEs.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Some users might be concerned about privacy and security, as Sourcegraph handles code browsing data, which may include sensitive information.

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

Sourcegraph for GitHub videos

No Sourcegraph for GitHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and Sourcegraph for GitHub)

Make.com

Sourcegraph for GitHub

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and Sourcegraph for GitHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and Sourcegraph for GitHub

Make.com Reviews

The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com
Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...
Source: www.listproductsreview.com

Sourcegraph for GitHub Reviews

We have no reviews of Sourcegraph for GitHub yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sourcegraph for GitHub seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sourcegraph for GitHub mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and Sourcegraph for GitHub, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Sourcegraph - Sourcegraph is a free, self-hosted code search and intelligence server that helps developers find, review, understand, and debug code. Use it with any Git code host for teams from 1 to 10,000+.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Gitstalk - Discover what your favorite GitHub users are up to

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

bloop - Code-search engine for developers

Loading...