Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Input Director VS git-fastclone

Compare Input Director VS git-fastclone and see what are their differences

Input Director

Control multiple windows systems with one keyboard/mouse. Share a keyboard and mouse across multiple windows system.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
git-fastclone

git clone --recursive on steroids, by Square

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
SetMe
Remote support software that just works. Securely access attended or unattended computers from anywhere. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Input Director seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 0
Remote Desktop popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Input Director
git-fastclone
Website inputdirector.com github.com
Listed in
Remote Desktop Remote PC Access Mouse Tools Multi Monitor +1
Software Development Git IDE Development +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Input Director 5 features
git-fastclone 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    Input Director offers a user-friendly interface and is relatively easy to set up and configure, making it accessible even for users who are not very tech-savvy.
  • Multiple Operating Systems
    The system allows seamless control of multiple computers running on different versions of the Windows operating system, supporting versatile use cases.
  • Clipboard Sharing
    It allows users to share the clipboard between the connected computers, making it easy to copy and paste text, files, and other data across different systems.
  • Customizable Hotkeys
    Users can set up custom hotkeys to switch control between different computers, enhancing workflow efficiency and convenience.
  • Secure Connections
    Input Director uses encrypted network traffic, ensuring secure communication between connected computers and protecting sensitive data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Windows Only
    Input Director is only available for Windows operating systems, limiting its usability for those who need cross-platform support, like integration with macOS or Linux.
  • Network Dependency
    The software requires a stable network connection between the computers. Without a reliable network, the performance can be compromised.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to some other commercial solutions, Input Director may lack advanced features like support for touchscreen gestures or more intricate keyboard mappings.
  • No Mobile Support
    Input Director does not offer support for controlling mobile devices, which can be a limitation for users who require integrated control over their smartphones or tablets.
  • Performance Issues
    Under certain circumstances, some users may experience latency or lag, particularly when dealing with graphics-intensive applications or large file transfers.
  • Faster clone times
    git-fastclone speeds up cloning of repositories with submodules by using reference repositories and caching, avoiding redundant downloads of shared objects across multiple clones.
  • Efficient submodule handling
    It automates the recursive cloning and updating of git submodules, reducing the manual overhead typically involved in managing nested repositories.
  • Local object caching
    By maintaining a local cache of repository objects, it minimizes network usage and disk space when cloning multiple repositories that share common history or dependencies.
  • Simple drop-in usage
    It is designed to be used similarly to the standard git clone command, making it easy for teams to adopt without significant changes to their existing workflows.
  • Useful for CI/CD pipelines
    Its speed improvements are particularly beneficial in continuous integration environments where repositories with many submodules are cloned repeatedly, reducing build times.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maintenance
    The project has seen infrequent updates and community activity in recent years, which may raise concerns about long-term support and compatibility with newer git versions.
  • Narrow use case
    It is primarily beneficial for repositories with many submodules; for simple repositories without submodules, the performance gains are minimal or negligible.
  • Additional complexity
    Introducing a caching and reference mechanism adds complexity to the clone process, which could lead to unexpected issues if the cache becomes corrupted or outdated.
  • Dependency on Ruby environment
    Since git-fastclone is implemented as a Ruby gem, users need a working Ruby environment installed, which can be an extra setup requirement for teams not already using Ruby.
  • Potential caching pitfalls
    Improper cache invalidation or stale cached objects can potentially lead to inconsistencies in cloned repositories if not carefully managed.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Input Director
git-fastclone

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Input Director is highly regarded for its functionality and efficiency in managing multiple systems. It offers a cost-effective and powerful solution for users looking to optimize their workflow without the complexity of additional hardware solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Input Director is considered a good software because it allows users to control multiple Windows computers with a single keyboard and mouse. It is particularly favored for its ease of use, reliability, and the ability to seamlessly switch controls across screens. The software supports features such as shared clipboard, drag-and-drop files, and customizable key bindings, which enhances user productivity, especially in multi-computer environments.

Recommended for

    Input Director is recommended for users who work with several Windows computers simultaneously, such as software developers, graphic designers, and IT professionals. It's ideal for anyone who needs to enhance their productivity in an environment with multiple screens or computers.

Overall verdict

  • git-fastclone is a solid, lightweight utility for speeding up repeated Git clone operations by caching repositories and reusing objects, making it a good choice for CI/CD pipelines and environments where the same repositories are cloned frequently.

Why this product is good

  • Reduces clone time significantly by caching repository objects locally and reusing them for subsequent clones
  • Simple to install and use, typically requiring minimal configuration or setup
  • Particularly effective in CI/CD environments where build agents repeatedly clone the same repositories
  • Open source and available on GitHub, allowing for community contributions and transparency
  • Helps reduce bandwidth usage and load on Git servers when cloning large repositories repeatedly

Recommended for

  • Development teams using CI/CD pipelines that require frequent repository cloning
  • Organizations working with large monorepos or repositories that are cloned often
  • DevOps engineers looking to optimize build and deployment pipeline performance
  • Teams with limited bandwidth or slow network connections to their Git hosting service
  • Projects with multiple build agents or ephemeral CI runners that need fresh clones frequently

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Input Director 3 videos + Add
git-fastclone 0 videos + Add

How to use one Mouse & Keyboard with two Computers - Input Director Tutorial

More videos

  • - Control Multiple Computers at Once! | Input Director Showcase and Tutorial
  • - Control Multiple Machines with Input Director

No git-fastclone videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Input Director
git-fastclone
100% 100%
Remote Desktop
0% 0%
0% 0%
Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Multi Monitor
0% 0%
0% 0%
Software Development
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Input Director and git-fastclone. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Input Director no reviews yet
git-fastclone no reviews yet

We have no reviews of git-fastclone yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Input Director 6 mentions
git-fastclone 0 mentions
  • Dual Computer Battlestations? Good idea? Bad idea?
    For the win8 tablet, I wanted to use it as an extra monitor but none of the normal options for doing it was working, so what I use now is Input Director. If you want to use multiple computers with dedicated screens per computer, this is... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Any ideas on good ways to be able to switching between my pc and laptop on these 2 monitors + M&K USBs?
    If you are looking for a software solution, https://inputdirector.com/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Easily switch between work and personal PC?
    There are various software solutions (eg.: Input Directorbut using a proper hardware switch is most likely the better option. And there are always the remote desktop options…. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

Tracking git-fastclone since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Input Director and git-fastclone

When comparing Input Director and git-fastclone, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...