Input Director VS cppq

• Ease of Use
  Input Director offers a user-friendly interface and is relatively easy to set up and configure, making it accessible even for users who are not very tech-savvy.
• Multiple Operating Systems
  The system allows seamless control of multiple computers running on different versions of the Windows operating system, supporting versatile use cases.
• Clipboard Sharing
  It allows users to share the clipboard between the connected computers, making it easy to copy and paste text, files, and other data across different systems.
• Customizable Hotkeys
  Users can set up custom hotkeys to switch control between different computers, enhancing workflow efficiency and convenience.
• Secure Connections
  Input Director uses encrypted network traffic, ensuring secure communication between connected computers and protecting sensitive data.

Possible disadvantages

• Windows Only
  Input Director is only available for Windows operating systems, limiting its usability for those who need cross-platform support, like integration with macOS or Linux.
• Network Dependency
  The software requires a stable network connection between the computers. Without a reliable network, the performance can be compromised.
• Limited Features
  Compared to some other commercial solutions, Input Director may lack advanced features like support for touchscreen gestures or more intricate keyboard mappings.
• No Mobile Support
  Input Director does not offer support for controlling mobile devices, which can be a limitation for users who require integrated control over their smartphones or tablets.
• Performance Issues
  Under certain circumstances, some users may experience latency or lag, particularly when dealing with graphics-intensive applications or large file transfers.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

How to use one Mouse & Keyboard with two Computers - Input Director Tutorial

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Top spacedesk Alternatives & Similar Software (2020)
  www.winosbite.com · Apr 2020

  Input Director, like Spacedesk helps you gain control over multiple computers while having to use just a single mouse or keyboard. You’ll just have to install the software on all the computers you wish to work on...

We have no reviews of cppq yet. Be the first one to post

• Dual Computer Battlestations? Good idea? Bad idea?

  For the win8 tablet, I wanted to use it as an extra monitor but none of the normal options for doing it was working, so what I use now is Input Director. If you want to use multiple computers with dedicated screens per computer, this is... Source: over 3 years ago

• Any ideas on good ways to be able to switching between my pc and laptop on these 2 monitors + M&K USBs?

  If you are looking for a software solution, https://inputdirector.com/. Source: about 4 years ago

• Easily switch between work and personal PC?

  There are various software solutions (eg.: Input Directorbut using a proper hardware switch is most likely the better option. And there are always the remote desktop options…. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.