Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) VS Chroma (Syntax Highlighter)

Compare Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) VS Chroma (Syntax Highlighter) and see what are their differences

Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) logo Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting)

A batteries-included syntax highlighting library for Rust, based on tree-sitter.

Chroma (Syntax Highlighter) logo Chroma (Syntax Highlighter)

Chroma takes source code and other structured text and converts it into syntax highlighted HTML, ANSI-coloured text, etc.
Not present
Not present

Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) features and specs

  • High Customizability
    Inkjet offers extensive options for customizing the appearance of code syntax highlighting, allowing users to tailor the visual presentation to their individual preferences or project requirements.
  • Rich Language Support
    The library supports a wide array of programming languages, making it versatile and useful for developers working with multiple languages.
  • Performance
    Inkjet is designed with performance in mind, providing efficient and fast syntax highlighting capabilities even for large blocks of code.
  • Integration Ease
    With clear documentation and examples, Inkjet is relatively easy to integrate into existing projects, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting)

  • Complex Configuration
    The high level of customizability can lead to complex configuration requirements, which might be overwhelming for some users, especially beginners.
  • Learning Curve
    While documentation is available, the library may still present a learning curve for individuals unfamiliar with syntax highlighting concepts or the specific implementation details of Inkjet.
  • Dependency Overhead
    Inkjet may introduce additional dependencies into a project, which could increase the maintenance burden and potentially complicate dependency management.
  • Limited GUI Integration
    While powerful for code rendering in text environments, Inkjet may have limitations or require additional effort to integrate into more complex graphical user interface applications.

Chroma (Syntax Highlighter) features and specs

  • Language Support
    Chroma offers extensive support for many programming languages, making it a versatile choice for syntax highlighting in diverse projects.
  • Go Implementation
    Implemented in Go, Chroma ensures fast performance and seamless integration in Go-based projects, benefiting developers working in the Go ecosystem.
  • Ease of Use
    Chroma is designed with simplicity in mind, allowing users to easily implement syntax highlighting in their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Compatibility
    It's compatible with styles from popular syntax highlighters, such as Pygments, which eases the transition for users migrating from those tools.
  • Playground Feature
    The Chroma Playground allows users to test and experiment with syntax highlighting in real-time, facilitating easier customization and evaluation of results.

Possible disadvantages of Chroma (Syntax Highlighter)

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to some long-established syntax highlighters, Chroma's ecosystem of plugins and community contributions is more limited, potentially affecting feature richness.
  • Go Dependency
    For projects not using Go, incorporating Chroma might introduce an additional dependency, which could be cumbersome for some development environments.
  • Less Community Support
    Being a relatively newer tool, Chroma might not have as extensive community support or documentation as older, more established syntax highlighters.
  • Customization Complexity
    While it offers many styles, deeply customizing these styles may require more effort and understanding of its workings than some other highlighters.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) and Chroma (Syntax Highlighter))
Customer Feedback
40 40%
60% 60
App Reviews
41 41%
59% 59
Marketing Tools
45 45%
55% 55
Documentation
38 38%
62% 62

User comments

Share your experience with using Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) and Chroma (Syntax Highlighter). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Inkjet (Syntax Highlighting) and Chroma (Syntax Highlighter), you can also consider the following products

prism.js - Prism is a lightweight, extensible syntax highlighter, built with modern web standards in mind.

Shiki - A beautiful syntax highlighter based on TextMate grammar, accurate and powerful.

highlight.js - Highlight.js is a syntax highlighter written in JavaScript. It works in the browser as well as on the server.

Torchlight.dev - Torchlight is a VS Code-compatible syntax highlighter that requires no JavaScript, supports every language, every VS Code theme, line highlighting, git diffing, and more.

starry-night - This package is an open source version of GitHubโ€™s closed-source PrettyLights project (more on that later).

Re-Highlight - Re-Highlight is a powerful text syntax highlighting library.