Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

imgproxy VS Squoosh

Compare imgproxy VS Squoosh and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

imgproxy logo imgproxy

Fast and secure, imgproxy by Evil Martians resizes and processes images without using disk space.

Squoosh logo Squoosh

Compress and compare images with different codecs, right in your browser
  • imgproxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Squoosh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-08-13

imgproxy features and specs

  • Performance
    imgproxy is designed for high performance, offering fast image processing and delivery. It achieves this with efficient algorithms and optimizations, ensuring minimal latency in serving images.
  • Security
    imgproxy prioritizes security by allowing developers to use signed URLs. This prevents unauthorized users from generating image URLs, thereby protecting resources from abuse.
  • Flexible Resizing
    Provides a wide range of options for resizing, cropping, and adjusting images, which can be easily configured via URL parameters to adapt to varying needs or display contexts.
  • On-the-fly Processing
    Processes images in real-time as requests are made, eliminating the need to pre-process and store multiple versions of an image, which helps reduce storage costs.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, imgproxy allows developers to review and modify the source code, fostering transparency and enabling customization to fit specific use cases.

Possible disadvantages of imgproxy

  • Resource Intensive Setup
    Setting up and maintaining imgproxy on your own infrastructure can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring significant time and technical expertise, especially for scaling.
  • Complex Configuration
    The flexibility offered by imgproxy comes with complex configuration requirements, which might pose a learning curve for new users unfamiliar with its setup.
  • Reliability on External Dependencies
    imgproxy requires dependency management and configuration (e.g., for caching and storage), which might be challenging to maintain consistently over time.
  • Limited Format Support
    While it supports the most commonly used image formats, edge cases or niche formats may not be well supported, potentially requiring additional tools for full compatibility.
  • Potential Latency
    On-the-fly processing, while convenient, may add latency for end-users if not properly managed with caching strategies, particularly under high load scenarios.

Squoosh features and specs

  • Free to Use
    Squoosh is a free web application, which makes it accessible to anyone without the need for a subscription or payment.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that simplifies the image compression process.
  • Multiple Formats Support
    Squoosh supports a wide range of image formats including JPEG, PNG, WebP, and AVIF, allowing for versatile usage.
  • Real-Time Comparison
    Users can compare the original and compressed images side-by-side in real time, providing immediate visual feedback on the compression quality.
  • Customization Options
    The app allows users to adjust various parameters such as quality, resizing, and other advanced settings for greater control over the compression.
  • Open Source
    Squoosh is an open-source project, meaning that its code is transparent and can be reviewed, modified, and improved by the community.
  • Offline Capability
    The application can also be used offline, adding a layer of convenience for users who may not always have consistent internet access.

Possible disadvantages of Squoosh

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While great for basic compression tasks, Squoosh might lack some advanced features found in professional image editing software.
  • File Size Limits
    There might be limitations on the size of the files that can be uploaded and processed, which could be a constraint for users dealing with very large images.
  • Web-Based Dependency
    As a web application, its performance can be influenced by the browser and device capability, which could vary significantly among users.
  • No Batch Processing
    Squoosh is designed for single-image processing. Users looking to compress multiple images at once will find this feature lacking.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Although it can be used offline, the nature of a web app raises concerns for users who prioritize privacy and data security.
  • Limited Support Resources
    Being a free tool, it doesn't come with professional support, so users might have to rely on community forums or documentation for help.

Analysis of Squoosh

Overall verdict

  • Squoosh is an excellent tool for anyone needing quick and efficient image compression. Its flexibility and privacy-focused approach make it particularly appealing. Overall, it provides a seamless experience with effective results.

Why this product is good

  • Squoosh is a versatile image compression tool that supports various formats including WebP, PNG, and JPEG. It's known for its ease of use, allowing users to compress images directly in the browser without needing to upload files to a server, thus ensuring privacy. The user interface is intuitive, providing real-time previews of compression results, and it offers advanced options for adjusting quality settings to achieve the desired balance between image quality and file size.

Recommended for

    Web developers, designers, bloggers, and anyone needing to optimize images for the web, particularly those concerned about maintaining image quality while reducing file size.

imgproxy videos

No imgproxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Squoosh videos

Jumbo Squoosh-oโ€™s Review! #SLIMESTAGRAM #JumboSquooshos

More videos:

  • Review - DIY Stress Balls | *NEW* Galaxy Squoosh-O's Unboxing & Review!! | Sneak Peek
  • Review - Jumbo Squoosh-O's DIY Stress Toy Kit: Unboxing, Setup & Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to imgproxy and Squoosh)
Software Engineering
100 100%
0% 0
Image Editing
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Image Optimisation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using imgproxy and Squoosh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare imgproxy and Squoosh

imgproxy Reviews

We have no reviews of imgproxy yet.
Be the first one to post

Squoosh Reviews

  1. Best tool to make images smaller or to figure out the right setting for batch work

    The only negative thing about this web app, is that it's not clear which formats are supported in which browsers.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Intuitive|Easy user interface|User-friendly|Great user experience|Web app|Offline mode|Fast ui|Fast

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Squoosh seems to be a lot more popular than imgproxy. While we know about 200 links to Squoosh, we've tracked only 14 mentions of imgproxy. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

imgproxy mentions (14)

  • Ask HN: What are you working on? (June 2026)
    2. I finished adding image uploads. Now you can add and view image attachments.
       This was quite a challenging task because there are a lot of security implications, and Cloudflare Workers don't support sharp. So I was implementing all the pixel bomb detection, optimizations, and other stuff by myself. Also, [imgproxy](https://imgproxy.net) came in handy as a price-efficient image processing solution.
    - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • How to survive and stay the course: hints for (very) small teams
    Running a tech product with a small team can feel like juggling on a unicycle during an earthquake. At imgproxy, we know this feeling since we're a compact team building an image processing engine used by some of the biggest platforms out there. We managed to elaborate some hacks that help us punch far above our weight and stay balanced. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • The Cost of Being Crawled: LLM Bots and Vercel Image API Pricing
    Maybe atleast link to the project https://imgproxy.net/ next time? Your comment is basically an ad for your product. I am sure many clicked the link expecting there to be some image resizing proxy solutionโ€ฆ. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Dynamic watermarking with imgproxy and Apache APISIX
    Another alternative is to use ready-made components, namely imgproxy and Apache APISIX. I already combined them to resize images on-the-fly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How Can I Streamline My Image Prep
    We use imgproxy which does 2->4 and all you need to do is change the URL on your site. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Squoosh mentions (200)

  • Can you build a recognizable World Map in under 500 bytes?
    Its a fun challenge. I used https://squoosh.app to make a pretty good one. Mostly just a resize and then OxiPNG for compression. Managed a 124x62 black/white image. OP has a resolution of 195x53, so I had very similar, but slightly worse I think? Mostly a different aspect ratio + map projection I think. Playing with Squoosh.app is very fun, and you can very easily see how the jump from 500b to ~1.5kb turns a map... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Speed Up Your WordPress Site in 30 Minutes: A No-Plugin Performance Guide
    Use a free tool like Squoosh (by Google) to batch convert your existing images to WebP. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Free Browser Tools for Developers Who Make Content
    Every image goes through Squoosh before it lands in any repo I own. Drag the file in, pick WebP or AVIF, drag the quality slider until the preview still looks clean, download. The size reduction is usually 60โ€“80% with no visible quality loss. It runs entirely locally in your browser โ€” nothing is uploaded anywhere. For a performance-conscious developer this matters. Best for: Pre-commit image optimisation, blog... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rust WASM vs TypeScript Performance: Why the 'Faster' Language Lost by 25% [2026]
    The Squoosh image compression app from Google is a great example. It runs codecs like MozJPEG and WebP entirely in WASM, processing large image buffers with minimal boundary crossings. Near-native compression performance, right in the browser. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Flutter App Taking Too Long to Start? Here's What You're Doing Wrong
    For images, tools like TinyPNG or Squoosh can reduce file sizes dramatically, often by 60-80%, with little to no visible quality difference. For your splash screen specifically, consider using a simple vector image (SVG) or even a plain color with your logo instead of a heavy raster image. Flutter's native splash screen supports this out of the box and it's blazing fast. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing imgproxy and Squoosh, you can also consider the following products

ImageBoss - On-demand content aware image processing API

TinyPNG - Make your website faster and save bandwidth. TinyPNG optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency!

imgix - Real-time Image Processing. Resize, crop, and process images on the fly, simply by changing their URLs.

iLoveIMG - iLoveIMG is one of most powerful solution that comes with all the major tool you cloud want to edit images in bulk.

FaceAware - Image processing with the ability to focus on faces ๐Ÿ“ธ๐Ÿ‘ถ

Caesium Image Compressor - Compress your pictures up to 90% without visible quality loss.