Software Alternatives & Startups

iftop VS Process Lasso

Compare iftop VS Process Lasso and see what are their differences

iftop

iftop does for network usage what top(1) does for CPU usage.

Rating
0 reviews
Process Lasso

Process Lasso is NOT yet another task manager.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Process Lasso seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 129 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 129
Monitoring Tools popularity
48% vs 52%
alternatives listed
59 vs 70

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

i
iftop
Process Lasso
Website pdw.ex-parrot.com bitsum.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

i
iftop 5 features
Process Lasso 5 features
  • Real-time Monitoring
    iftop provides real-time bandwidth monitoring, enabling users to quickly identify network usage and any potential issues.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool features a simple, text-based user interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for users with varying levels of experience.
  • Detailed Traffic Insight
    iftop offers detailed information about network traffic, including source and destination IP addresses, service ports, and data flow rates.
  • Lightweight
    Being a command-line tool, iftop is lightweight in nature and does not consume significant system resources.
  • Open Source
    iftop is open source, allowing users to access, modify, and distribute the software freely, which can lead to community-driven improvements.

Possible disadvantages

  • Lacks Historical Data
    iftop does not have the capability to store historical data, making it unsuitable for long-term network monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to other network monitoring tools, iftop has a limited feature set and may not meet the requirements of advanced network analysis needs.
  • Requires Root Permissions
    The tool requires root or elevated permissions to run, which might be a security concern in certain environments.
  • Text-based Output
    As a text-based tool, iftop may not provide the most visually appealing outputs, which can be a drawback for users who prefer graphical interfaces.
  • Not Cross-Platform
    iftop is primarily designed for Unix-like systems and may not be available or easily operable on non-Unix platforms like Windows.
  • Improved System Responsiveness
    Process Lasso dynamically adjusts the priority of running processes, ensuring that system-critical tasks are not bogged down by resource-heavy applications. This leads to a more responsive and smoother computing experience.
  • ProBalance Technology
    The proprietary ProBalance algorithm intelligently balances CPU usage, preventing system stalls and ensuring that no single application consumes too many CPU cycles, which is especially useful when running multiple applications simultaneously.
  • Automation Features
    Process Lasso offers extensive automation features such as rules for process priority, automatic termination of certain applications, and power profile switching, allowing for a highly customized and automated system management experience.
  • Energy Efficiency
    By optimizing CPU usage and reducing unnecessary background processes, Process Lasso can improve energy efficiency, which is especially advantageous for laptop users aiming to extend battery life.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Process Lasso provides a comprehensive yet intuitive user interface, making it easy for both novice and expert users to navigate and utilize its features effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, the array of options and features can be overwhelming for new users, requiring some time and effort to understand and utilize fully.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Process Lasso has limited functionality compared to the Pro version, which may push users towards purchasing a license to unlock its full potential.
  • Resource Usage
    While Process Lasso aims to optimize system performance, it itself is an additional background process, which means it consumes some system resources, although minimal.
  • Complexity of Advanced Features
    The advanced features, such as custom rules and automation tasks, can be quite complex to configure correctly, potentially leading to unintended consequences if not set up properly.
  • Cost
    For those requiring the full feature set, the cost of the Pro version can be considered a downside, particularly for casual users who may not need the advanced functionalities.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

i
iftop
Process Lasso

No analysis of iftop yet.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Process Lasso is generally considered a good tool for optimizing system performance.

Why this product is good

  • Process Lasso is praised for its ability to manage and optimize CPU usage through its ProBalance technology, which prevents system slowdowns by adjusting the priority of background processes. It provides features like automated rules, power profile automation, and performance mode, which enhance the user's computer performance without manual intervention.

Recommended for

  • Users experiencing frequent system slowdowns or stalls due to high CPU usage.
  • Gamers looking for improved performance and reduced input lag during gameplay.
  • IT professionals and power users who need advanced tools for system and process management.
  • Anyone looking for a set-and-forget solution to maintain system responsiveness under heavy load.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

i
iftop 3 videos + Add
Process Lasso 2 videos + Add

How to monitor network bandwidth using Iftop

More videos

  • - How to install iftop and use it on Linux Mint 18.3
  • - Untangle Traffic monitoring with Iftop

Is Process Lasso Worth it? | SMT OFF vs Process Lasso vs Windows Affinity | Ryzen 5 1600

More videos

  • - Using Process Lasso to avoid gaming mode reboots on Ryzen ThreadRipper

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
i
iftop
Process Lasso
48% 48%
52% 52%
32% 32%
68% 68%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using iftop and Process Lasso. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

i
iftop 0 mentions
Process Lasso 129 mentions

Tracking iftop since Mar 2021.

  • skype is using 20/30% of my CPU all the time even when its on the idle mode.
    If that helps then you can try Process Lasso to automate this. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • CS2 Performance - Intel 12/13/14gen users should DISABLE E-Cores!
    CoreDirector is pretty straight forward and easy to use, but on my machine it caused micro-stutters even if I had higher frames. I used Process Lasso to do this, which should be the same thing CoreDirector does, but it worked better for me. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Another (possible) Fix for the 5 seconds stuttering (Even on SSD)
    If BES doesn't work for you, you can try Project Lasso for free: https://bitsum.com/. On this one, I've set the CPU Limiter to when the process reach 85% for 2 seconds, limit by 1 core for 1 second. You can also reduce the CPU affinity... Source: almost 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to iftop and Process Lasso

When comparing iftop and Process Lasso, you can also consider the following products.