Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Icecoder VS Howl

Compare Icecoder VS Howl and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Icecoder logo Icecoder

ICEcoder is a browser code editor which provides a modern approach to building websites.

Howl logo Howl

General purpose editor that aims to be both lightweight and fully customizable
  • Icecoder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • Howl Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-27

Icecoder features and specs

  • Open Source
    ICEcoder is open source, meaning it can be freely used and modified. Developers can contribute to its development and customize it to fit their specific needs.
  • Web-Based
    It runs directly in the browser, making it easy to access and use without the need for installing software on your local machine.
  • Multi-Language Support
    ICEcoder supports multiple programming languages, making it a versatile tool for developers working with different technologies.
  • Lightweight
    ICEcoder is lightweight, ensuring quick load times and efficient performance even on less powerful machines.
  • Integrated Git
    The platform provides integrated Git support, which helps in version control and collaborative development.
  • FTP/SFTP Integrations
    ICEcoder includes FTP and SFTP integrations, allowing users to easily manage and transfer files between local and remote servers.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    The tool supports real-time collaborative editing, enabling multiple developers to work on the same file simultaneously.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    It offers syntax highlighting for various programming languages, which makes code easier to read and debug.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    ICEcoder has a clean and intuitive user interface, making it accessible to both novice and experienced developers.

Possible disadvantages of Icecoder

  • Limited Features Compared to Full IDEs
    While powerful, ICEcoder may lack some advanced features available in full-fledged Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like IntelliJ IDEA or Visual Studio.
  • Dependent on Internet Connectivity
    Being a web-based tool, it requires a stable internet connection to access and use, which may be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Potential Security Concerns
    As with any web-based tool, there might be security vulnerabilities, especially when working with sensitive code or data.
  • Customization Limitations
    While it is customizable, there may be limitations in comparison to more flexible local development environments.
  • Performance Issues with Large Projects
    For very large projects, performance might be an issue compared to desktop-based IDEs that are better optimized for handling large files and complex codebases.
  • Browser Compatibility
    ICEcoder relies on the browser for its functionality, which means its performance and features might vary across different web browsers.

Howl features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Howl features a clean and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and use the platform effectively.
  • Comprehensive Analytics
    The platform provides detailed analytics and insights, helping users understand their audience better and optimize their content strategy.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Howl offers seamless integration with various social media platforms, enabling users to manage multiple accounts from a single dashboard.
  • Content Scheduling
    Users can schedule posts in advance, ensuring consistent content delivery and saving time on manual posting.
  • Customer Support
    Howl provides robust customer support through various channels, assisting users with any issues or questions they may encounter.

Possible disadvantages of Howl

  • Pricing
    The subscription plans might be considered expensive for small businesses or individual users who are on a tight budget.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, some advanced features may have a learning curve, requiring users to spend time understanding how to utilize them effectively.
  • Feature Overload
    The abundance of features can be overwhelming for new users, potentially leading to confusion or underutilization of the platform.
  • Occasional Glitches
    Users have reported occasional glitches or bugs within the platform, which can disrupt workflow and require troubleshooting.

Analysis of Icecoder

Overall verdict

  • Icecoder is a solid choice for developers seeking an efficient and straightforward coding tool that offers flexibility and ease of use, especially for those who frequently work on remote servers.

Why this product is good

  • Icecoder is a web-based code editor that is designed for simplicity and accessibility. It offers features like a simple interface, support for multiple file types, syntax highlighting, and the ability to edit code directly on a server. It's particularly useful for developers looking for a lightweight, easy-to-use coding environment that can be accessed from anywhere. It also supports extensions, allowing for customization to meet different development needs.

Recommended for

  • Freelancers
  • Web Developers
  • Small Businesses
  • Developers who need remote access to code

Icecoder videos

+ Add

ICEcoder v1.0.0 Launched!

More videos:

  • Review - ICEcoder - Eine Einführung / Teil 1

Howl videos

+ Add

Howl (2015) - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - HOWL (2015) review + brief history of werewolves in film
  • Review - Howl (2015) - Blood Splattered Vlog (Horror Movie Reviews)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Icecoder and Howl)

Icecoder

Howl

Text Editors
50 50%
Text Editors
50% 50
IDE
58 58%
IDE
42% 42
Development
59 59%
Development
41% 41
Word
100 100%
Word
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Icecoder and Howl. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Howl seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Icecoder mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Icecoder yet. Tracking of Icecoder recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Howl mentions (1)

  • What are peoples favorite free and open source software
    There are many but I want to do some advertisement for Howl. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Icecoder and Howl, you can also consider the following products

TEA Text Editor - TEA Text Editor is a tool that is used for editing texts in virtually every mainstream roaming language such as Python, HTML, XML, C, and Java to name a few.

Xed - A text editor forked from Pluma and Gedit. Xed is the default text editor of Linux Mint.

Nova Code Editor - Nova Code Editor is software that is used for writing and editing codes.

Caret Editor - Caret Editor is an editing tool for Chrome OS that is used for editing texts or codes.

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

Scribe Text Editor - Scribe Text Editor is a text editing tool that can also be used as a web extension.

Loading...