Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM Secure Gateway VS Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Compare IBM Secure Gateway VS Symantec Cloud Workload Protection and see what are their differences

IBM Secure Gateway logo IBM Secure Gateway

IBM Secure Gateway is a cloud service that enables you to establish a secure tunnel between the specific resources you want to connect.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection logo Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection enables business agility and cost savings by automating security for public cloud workloads. Visit Symantec to learn more.
  • IBM Secure Gateway Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20
  • Symantec Cloud Workload Protection Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-30

IBM Secure Gateway features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security
    Symantec Cloud Workload Protection provides extensive security features that include intrusion detection, threat intelligence, and vulnerability management, helping businesses protect their cloud environments comprehensively.
  • Scalability
    The solution is designed to scale with your cloud infrastructure, making it suitable for businesses of all sizes and able to adapt as workload demands increase.
  • Centralized Management
    Symantec offers a centralized management console that simplifies the monitoring and management of security across multiple cloud services and environments.
  • Automated Processes
    Automation capabilities help reduce the administrative overhead by enabling automated detection and response to threats, thereby improving efficiency.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations maintain compliance with various industry standards and regulations by offering security controls and reporting features.

Possible disadvantages of Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

  • Complexity
    The extensive range of features can be complex for some users to configure and manage effectively without adequate training or support.
  • Cost
    The pricing may be on the higher side, which could be a concern for smaller businesses or those with budget constraints.
  • Integration Challenges
    Users might experience difficulty with seamless integration into existing IT environments and workflows, which can require additional resources and time.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running comprehensive security features can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting the performance of the cloud environment if not managed properly.

IBM Secure Gateway videos

Create an IBM Secure Gateway in IBM Planning Analytics

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection videos

How Symantec Cloud Workload Protection Secures LifeLock on AWS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Secure Gateway and Symantec Cloud Workload Protection)
Security
13 13%
87% 87
Monitoring Tools
9 9%
91% 91
Web Application Security
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
10 10%
90% 90

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Secure Gateway and Symantec Cloud Workload Protection. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Secure Gateway and Symantec Cloud Workload Protection, you can also consider the following products

Google Cloud Platform Security Overview - Cloud Workload Protection Platforms

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Nutanix Beam - Nutanix Beam is a multi-cloud optimization service

Azure Security Center - Turn on Azure Security Center to gain unmatched hybrid cloud security management and threat protection for your workloads.

Lacework - Lacework is a highly trusted platform that provides security for Cloud Environments, DevOps, and Containers.