I hate mailto VS cppq

• Usability
  iHateMailto enhances user experience by preventing unwanted email application pop-ups when users click on mailto links, making web navigation smoother.
• Customization
  Allows developers to customize behaviors for email links, offering alternatives like copying the email address to clipboard or directing users to a contact form.
• User Preference
  Accommodates users who prefer web-based email clients over desktop applications, providing flexibility in how they handle email links.

Possible disadvantages

• Browser Compatibility
  Not all functionalities might be compatible with every browser, potentially leading to inconsistent user experiences.
• JavaScript Dependent
  The solution relies on JavaScript, which can pose issues for users who have disabled it or for environments with limited JavaScript support.
• Accessibility Concerns
  Altering default behavior of mailto links may confuse users relying on assistive technologies, who expect standard functionality.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

No analysis of I hate mailto yet.

• How to get the email address from <a href="#email">

  Oh, I'm sure there is. I don't know enough browser under the hood to understand it when to snitch it. This guy might. Source: almost 4 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.