Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Hyper VS Ninja Build

Compare Hyper VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Hyper

Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Measure.sh
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hyper should be more popular than Ninja Build. It has been mentioned 47 times since March 2021.

social mentions
47 vs 23
Terminal Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 53

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Hyper
Ninja Build
Website hyper.is ninja-build.org
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in
Terminal Tools Emulators Terminal Developer Tools +1
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Hyper 5 features
Ninja Build 5 features
  • Cross-Platform
    Hyper is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Extensibility
    Hyper is built on web technologies like JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, allowing users to customize and extend it with plugins and themes easily.
  • Modern UI
    It offers a sleek and modern user interface that is visually appealing and user-friendly.
  • Performance
    Despite being built on Electron, Hyper's performance is generally satisfactory for the majority of terminal tasks.
  • Ecosystem
    A rich ecosystem of plugins and themes is available, which enhances the terminal's functionality and customization options.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Usage
    As an Electron-based application, Hyper can consume more memory and CPU compared to more lightweight terminal emulators.
  • Startup Time
    Hyper may have a slower startup time compared to native terminal applications because it initializes a lot of components at launch.
  • Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with web development technologies, customizing and extending Hyper might be challenging.
  • Stability
    Occasional bugs and crashes can occur, especially when using numerous plugins or custom configurations.
  • Native Feature Gaps
    Some of the features available in native terminal emulators might be missing or less optimized in Hyper.
  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninja’s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Hyper
Ninja Build

Overall verdict

  • Hyper is a good choice for users who value customization and a visually appealing interface over performance. While it may not match the speed and efficiency of native terminal applications, its flexibility and design appeal to those who are comfortable with and prefer Electron-based applications.

Why this product is good

  • Hyper is an electron-based terminal that is highly customizable, allowing users to enhance its functionality through plugins and themes. It's built with web technologies, making it easy for developers familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to contribute and modify. This enables a rich ecosystem of community contributions, offering users a wide variety of enhancements to tailor the terminal experience to their needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer a customizable terminal environment
  • Users who enjoy experimenting with plugins and themes
  • Individuals who prioritize design and aesthetics in their tooling

Overall verdict

  • Ninja Build is considered a strong choice for users seeking a fast, reliable, and efficient build system. Its simplicity and focus on performance make it appealing to developers working on projects where build speed is critical.

Why this product is good

  • Ninja Build is a high-performance build system designed to handle complex build processes efficiently. It is known for its minimalistic yet powerful design, which allows for faster build times compared to traditional build systems like Make. Its approach to dependency tracking and parallelism is optimized for modern build environments, making it suitable for large codebases and incremental builds.

Recommended for

    Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Hyper 3 videos + Add
Ninja Build 1 video + Add

Motorola One Hyper Review

More videos

  • - SKECHERS GOrun RAZOR 3 HYPER & GOrun 7 HYPER REVIEW | The Ginger Runner
  • - Motorola One Hyper "Real Review"

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Hyper
Ninja Build
100% 100%
Terminal Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Hyper and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Hyper no reviews yet
Ninja Build no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Ninja Build yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Hyper 47 mentions
Ninja Build 23 mentions
  • A Fig That Works Anywhere — FaiTerm
    This was Fig's smartest move. Every other approach at the time either forced you onto a brand-new terminal emulator (Warp, Tabby) or left you stuck with the weak completion of the day. Fig chose to piggyback instead — it supported macOS... - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Ratty – A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics
    Or Terminal is already a full featured web browser? https://hyper.is/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Hyper – Standards first React alternative
    I wish open-source projects checked to see if other projects share the same name. Especially since there are packages in NPM already about hyper. https://hyper.is/ has been around for a while and is kind of big. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

  • CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project
    On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Hyper and Ninja Build

When comparing Hyper and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...