Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Hyper VS IceWM

Compare Hyper VS IceWM and see what are their differences

Modelence
Create production-ready applications with zero code featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Hyper logo Hyper

Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

IceWM logo IceWM

icewm home page . Bug Tracking. If you have a patch, a bug report or a feature request to submit, please do so at the icewm project page at SourceForge.
  • Hyper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • IceWM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07

Hyper features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    Hyper is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Extensibility
    Hyper is built on web technologies like JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, allowing users to customize and extend it with plugins and themes easily.
  • Modern UI
    It offers a sleek and modern user interface that is visually appealing and user-friendly.
  • Performance
    Despite being built on Electron, Hyper's performance is generally satisfactory for the majority of terminal tasks.
  • Ecosystem
    A rich ecosystem of plugins and themes is available, which enhances the terminal's functionality and customization options.

Possible disadvantages of Hyper

  • Resource Usage
    As an Electron-based application, Hyper can consume more memory and CPU compared to more lightweight terminal emulators.
  • Startup Time
    Hyper may have a slower startup time compared to native terminal applications because it initializes a lot of components at launch.
  • Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with web development technologies, customizing and extending Hyper might be challenging.
  • Stability
    Occasional bugs and crashes can occur, especially when using numerous plugins or custom configurations.
  • Native Feature Gaps
    Some of the features available in native terminal emulators might be missing or less optimized in Hyper.

IceWM features and specs

  • Lightweight
    IceWM is designed to be fast and frugal with system resources, making it ideal for older hardware or systems with limited RAM and processing power.
  • Customizable
    Users can easily customize the look and feel of IceWM using themes and configurations without needing advanced technical knowledge.
  • Simple and Intuitive
    The window manager offers a straightforward, no-frills interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for new users.
  • Stable and Reliable
    IceWM is known for its robustness and stability, reducing the likelihood of crashes and bugs compared to more complex window managers.
  • Efficient with X Resources
    IceWM is very efficient in how it utilizes X resources, contributing to its overall speed and responsiveness.
  • Integrated Taskbar
    The built-in taskbar includes features like a system tray, app launcher, and workspace switcher, providing essential functionality without additional software.

Possible disadvantages of IceWM

  • Limited Advanced Features
    IceWM might lack some of the advanced features and eye-candy that are available in more modern or feature-rich window managers and desktop environments.
  • Basic Default Appearance
    Out of the box, IceWM may appear somewhat basic or outdated, requiring user customization to enhance its aesthetics.
  • Manual Editing for Customization
    While IceWM is customizable, it often requires manual editing of text files for configuration, which might be cumbersome for some users.
  • Limited Community and Support
    Compared to more popular desktop environments like GNOME or KDE, IceWM has a smaller user community, which may lead to fewer resources and less community support.
  • Minimalist Approach
    The minimalist approach, while beneficial for resource usage, might not cater to users looking for a fully integrated and richly featured desktop environment.

Analysis of Hyper

Overall verdict

  • Hyper is a good choice for users who value customization and a visually appealing interface over performance. While it may not match the speed and efficiency of native terminal applications, its flexibility and design appeal to those who are comfortable with and prefer Electron-based applications.

Why this product is good

  • Hyper is an electron-based terminal that is highly customizable, allowing users to enhance its functionality through plugins and themes. It's built with web technologies, making it easy for developers familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to contribute and modify. This enables a rich ecosystem of community contributions, offering users a wide variety of enhancements to tailor the terminal experience to their needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer a customizable terminal environment
  • Users who enjoy experimenting with plugins and themes
  • Individuals who prioritize design and aesthetics in their tooling

Hyper videos

+ Add

Motorola One Hyper Review

More videos:

  • Review - SKECHERS GOrun RAZOR 3 HYPER & GOrun 7 HYPER REVIEW | The Ginger Runner
  • Review - Motorola One Hyper "Real Review"

IceWM videos

+ Add

Obscure Window Manager Project - IceWM

More videos:

  • Tutorial - IceWM Tutorial - The fastest Linux window manager
  • Demo - antiX 19 beta 3 IceWM Demo Features Review II

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hyper and IceWM)

Hyper

IceWM

Terminal Tools
100 100%
Terminal Tools
0% 0
Window Manager
0 0%
Window Manager
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Linux
0 0%
Linux
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hyper and IceWM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hyper and IceWM

Hyper Reviews

MobaXterm for Mac: Best Alternatives to MobaXterm for Mac
Hyper is an electron based terminal for Mac OS and other platforms. The Hyper is build on the HTML, CSS and JavaScript. It is designed to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users. It is a simple still the best alternative to MobaXterm for Mac with speed, stability and development of the correct API for extension authors. In future, it...
Source: www.macoszon.com
Top 14 Terminal Emulators for Linux (With Extra Features or Amazing Looks)
Hyper is yet another interesting terminal emulator that is built on web technologies. It doesnโ€™t provide a unique user experience, but looks quite different and offers a ton of customization options.
Source: itsfoss.com
30 best PuTTY alternatives for SSH clients for 2020
Hyper is a free open source emulator written for Windows, Mac OS, and Linux. It can be extended with add-ons, but has no encryption or file transfer option.
Source: www.comparitech.com

IceWM Reviews

We have no reviews of IceWM yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hyper seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 46 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hyper mentions (46)

  • Ratty โ€“ A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics
    Or Terminal is already a full featured web browser? https://hyper.is/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Hyper โ€“ Standards first React alternative
    I wish open-source projects checked to see if other projects share the same name. Especially since there are packages in NPM already about hyper. https://hyper.is/ has been around for a while and is kind of big. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • How to make your terminal looks Splendid
    WARP First thing, we need to choose the best terminal app to do this, I usually use one called Hyper Term, but in the last months I've been using another one called Warp terminal, I started to use it because it is an AI powered terminal, basically we can use the terminal AI to get the best bash commands, and improve ours shell scripts and commands, that why I chose it for this tutorial. So we need to download it. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Leveraging Wasp for full-stack development
    A modern terminal shell such as zsh, iTerm2 with oh-my-zsh for Mac, or Hyper for Windows. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Terminal commands I use as a frontend developer
    I am using iTerm2 on my macOS. Other available options are Hyper and VS Codeโ€™s inbuilt terminal, which I sometimes use for quick tests. You can open a terminal in VS Code by using the keyboard shortcut CMD + J or CTRL + J on Windows, or View โ†’ Terminal. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

IceWM mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IceWM yet. Tracking of IceWM recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hyper and IceWM, you can also consider the following products

iTerm2 - A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

Fluxbox - Fluxbox is a window manager for X that was based on the Blackbox 0.61.1 code.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.

Openbox - Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.

Windows Terminal - A new command line interface for Windows machines

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Loading...