
Apollo.io
Lusha
Snov.io
ZoomInfo
ZeroBounce
Clearbit
NeverBounce
Find all the email addresses related to a domain

CodeStream
CodeTogether
GitDuck
Floobits
Duckly
replit
Notion
Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Hunter.io seems to be a lot more popular than GitLive. While we know about 155 links to Hunter.io, we've tracked only 3 mentions of GitLive.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | hunter.io | git.live |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from France | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Hunter.io yet.
📣 The future of social coding Connect. ◾️See when your fellow contributors are online and which repos, branches and files they are working on. Automated. ◾️Connect your issue tracker to share what issue you are working on based on your current branch. 📣 Resolve conflicts before they happen Live....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of GitLive yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
GTA Hunter Review
More videos
Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Hunter.io and GitLive. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Hunter, Lusha, and LeadIQ all have free plans. Among paid plans on monthly billing, LeadIQ Pro starts at $20 a month for up to 5 users, and Hunter Starter starts at €49 a month.The cheapest option depends on whether...
Hunter, on the other hand, is built around email discovery, verification, and cold email sequencing. It doesn’t automate LinkedIn actions, but instead helps you find and validate professional email addresses and run...
I tested the waterfall enrichment to understand how it works. Clay pulls the data you need from over 100 sources. Say you want to find your prospect’s valid email address, Clay scans various sources like Hunter,...
We have no reviews of GitLive yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
The real conclusion I'd push back on from every vendor comparison I've read: there is no single tool that solves reverse lookup at 80%+ accuracy with clean data. The waterfall is the answer. The question is whether you build it yourself... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n — pulling from public sources before hitting any... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
There are plenty of tools that have started popping up to try and improve this situation since last year. CodeTogether, Duckly, Code With Me, and GitLive to name a few. Source: almost 5 years ago
GitLive. Extend your IDE with the real-time features remote development teams need to work together effectively. See what your teammates are working on and get notified of merge conflicts before you commit. Make video calls and code... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
This is in no way an answer to your question but perhaps you would find git.live's merge conflict detection feature useful to potentially avoid the conflicts in the first place 😅. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing Hunter.io and GitLive, you can also consider the following products.

Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Compare Apollo.io to Hunter.io or GitLive:

CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE
Compare CodeStream to Hunter.io or GitLive:


Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.
Compare CodeTogether to Hunter.io or GitLive:

Snov.io is a multichannel lead generation and outreach automation platform that helps B2B teams find qualified leads, automate email and LinkedIn campaigns, and manage deals in one built-in CRM.
Compare Snov.io to Hunter.io or GitLive:

GitDuck is the easiest way to explain your code to other developers. Show how you code and record videos linked to your source code.
Compare GitDuck to Hunter.io or GitLive: