hub VS Micro
Compare hub VS Micro and see what are their differences
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context.
sponsored
hub
CodeHub
Working Copy
Diff So Fancy
Git Flow
LS Intranet
Communifire
GVfs
Micro
VS Code
fzf
fd
Neovim
Bat
Notepad++
Vim Adventures
hub MicroMicro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.
Based on our record, Micro seems to be a lot more popular than hub. While we know about 88 links to Micro, we've tracked only 4 mentions of hub. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Use hub here via CLI and forget the gui https://hub.github.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Try automating the PR process as much as possible. Make use of tools like hub CLI for speeding up the pull request process. Code quality tools can help you automate the due diligence for coding standards and conventions, and test automation tools can assist in bug discovery, and identifying security vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Parse_git_branch() { # Speed up opening up a new terminal tab by not # checking `$HOME` ...which can't be a repo anyway # # For the heck of it, micro-optimize this too: # time (repeat 1000000 { [ "$PWD" = "$HOME" ] } ) == ~4.2s # time (repeat 1000000 { [[ "$PWD" == "$HOME" ]] } ) == ~1.4s [[ "$PWD" == "$HOME" ]] && return # Fastest known way to check the current branch name ... Source: about 4 years ago
You can always query via github api or use the hub client (from their home page https://hub.github.com/). Source: almost 5 years ago
Micro editor is a great choice as well imo but I don't think that micro has the thriving plugin ecosystem as compared to neovim but it is possible to make plugins for micro editor as well https://github.com/micro-editor/plugin-channel Link to Micro editor: https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
If you are talking about agents I feel like opencode has gotten pretty good UI/UX If you are talking about a CLI editor, then micro has hit the nail on quality UX https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I tend to use micro[0] on most of my systems now just because it comes with really lovely defaults and keybindings that are a bit more familiar, but this might make me take a second look at nano in future. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
I have tried to run micro https://micro-editor.github.io/ on my phone but this is some other beast if someone is running tmux and vim on their phone I have found that typing normally is really preferably on android and usually I didn't like having to press columns or ctrl or anything so as such since micro is really just such a great thing overall, it fit so perfectly that when I had that device, I was coding more... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
You literally, and I mean literally read my mind dear random stranger down to the wording. Micro is definitely underrated. Micro is a truly goated software. I mean, it can genuinely replace vscode for small scale editing in the context of shopify that the parent comment was referring to. https://micro-editor.github.io/ It also helped me in physics when I had to remember the units like 10^-6 being micro, 10^-9... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.
VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Working Copy - The powerful Git client for iOS
fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go
Diff So Fancy - Make Git diffs look good
fd - A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.