Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hover.css VS Vux

Compare Hover.css VS Vux and see what are their differences

Hover.css logo Hover.css

A collection of CSS3 powered hover effects to be applied to links, buttons, logos, etc.

Vux logo Vux

Vux is a suite of components based on Vue and weUI, providing a Material Design framework for Vue.js.
  • Hover.css Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-09
  • Vux Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Hover.css features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hover.css provides a wide variety of hover effects that are easy to implement by simply applying predefined CSS classes to HTML elements.
  • Wide Variety
    It offers over 41 different effects, providing developers with a broad selection to enhance user interfaces with minimal effort.
  • Customizable
    The effects can be customized to suit the needs of a project, allowing for modifications in timing, color, and behavior using additional CSS.
  • Lightweight
    Hover.css is lightweight, meaning it won't significantly increase the loading time of web pages, maintaining efficient performance.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Designed to work across most modern browsers, ensuring consistent behavior for users regardless of their choice of browser.

Possible disadvantages of Hover.css

  • Limited Mobile Support
    Hover.css, like any hover-based effect library, is less effective on touch devices that do not support hover states.
  • Dependency on Modern CSS
    Some effects may use modern CSS techniques not supported by outdated browsers, potentially leading to inconsistent experiences.
  • Basic Customizability
    While customizable, the effects might require additional effort to deeply integrate unique interactions compared to writing custom CSS.
  • Overhead
    For simple projects, including an entire library for a few effects might be unnecessary overhead compared to creating bespoke effects with CSS.

Vux features and specs

  • Mobile UI Components
    Vux offers a comprehensive set of mobile UI components that are specifically designed for building mobile applications, making it easier for developers to create mobile-friendly interfaces.
  • Vue.js Integration
    Vux is built on top of Vue.js, allowing seamless integration with Vueโ€™s ecosystem, which makes it convenient for developers already familiar with Vue.js to utilize Vux in their projects.
  • Customization
    Vux provides a considerable level of customization, enabling developers to tailor the components according to their specific project requirements and design aesthetics.
  • Active Community
    The Vux community is quite active, providing ample resources, plugins, and support for newcomers and experienced developers needing assistance.

Possible disadvantages of Vux

  • Limited Documentation
    Users have reported that Vux's documentation is not as comprehensive or detailed as it could be which might create challenges for developers new to the library.
  • Dependency on WeUI
    Vux is largely based on WeUI components, which can limit the flexibility and design choices available to developers seeking unique custom designs.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    There might be concerns regarding the frequency and consistency of updates and maintenance, which can affect the long-term viability of projects that rely heavily on Vux.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite being based on Vue.js, Vux has its own learning curve due to the additional components and design considerations, which can be intimidating for new developers.

Hover.css videos

No Hover.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Vux videos

VUXVUX FACE REVEAL?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hover.css and Vux)
Design Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Developer Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Hover.css and Vux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hover.css and Vux

Hover.css Reviews

We have no reviews of Hover.css yet.
Be the first one to post

Vux Reviews

15 of the Most Interesting Vue UI Component Libraries for 2023
Vux is a Vue framework based on WeChatโ€™s WeUI and webpack. However, the documentation is mostly in Chinese, with minimal English translation. Vux primarily emphasizes on quick development of mobile components for your application.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hover.css and Vux, you can also consider the following products

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Keen-UI - Keen-UI is a material design framework for Vue.js.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

Buefy - Lightweight UI components for Vue.js based on Bulma

GSAP - GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) is a suite of JavaScript tools for high-performance animations that work in all major browsers.

Vuetify - Material Component Framework for VueJS 2