
TailScale
ngrok
Cloudflare Tunnel
ZeroTier
NetBird
WireGuard
Nebula
Cloud-managed secure access between your devices and services.
Application and Data, Libraries, and JavaScript Framework Components

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Ember-cli seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
E
Ember-cli
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | hostanywhere.io | cli.emberjs.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
HostAnywhere Quick Overview
No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

As answered by people managing HostAnywhere and Ember-cli.
HostAnywhere's answer
HostAnywhere is the only mesh networking tool that includes end-to-end encrypted phone backups to your own storage as a built-in feature. Most agents in the category (Tailscale, Netbird, Zerotier) stop at "your devices can talk to each other." HostAnywhere also gives your phone an automatic place to back up Photos, Videos, Contacts, and Calendars — landing on any always-on device you own (NAS, mini-PC, Raspberry Pi). It's one agent that replaces a typical stack of Tailscale + ngrok + iCloud + Immich.
HostAnywhere's answer
Built by Naveen, a solo founder, who was tired of running four overlapping tools to do what felt like one job: Tailscale for mesh, Cloudflare Tunnel for public URLs, iCloud for phone backup, Syncthing for file sync. The push from side project to product was the frustration of paying a monthly subscription to send iPhone photos to someone else's servers while having plenty of storage at home. The first release shipped as a single agent across iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, and Linux — same user experience, one account managing all of it.
HostAnywhere's answer
Three reasons:
HostAnywhere's answer
Technical individuals and small-to-mid teams (1–25 people) who want to own their data without running five separate self-hosted services. Strongest fit:
Larger organizations also adopt the Enterprise tier for unlimited devices and unlimited posture integrations.
HostAnywhere's answer
HostAnywhere is privately held and does not publicly list its customer roster. Usage today spans individuals, solo developers, and small IT teams across the US, Europe, India, and Australia, with active pilot discussions in the 50–500-device range.
HostAnywhere's answer
Share your experience with using HostAnywhere and Ember-cli. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Tracking HostAnywhere since Jun 2026.
The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago
When comparing HostAnywhere and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.

Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.
Compare TailScale to HostAnywhere or Ember-cli:

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to HostAnywhere or Ember-cli:

Connect applications, servers, and other resources to Cloudflare's network via encrypted outbound tunnels. No publicly routable IPs or VMs required.
Compare Cloudflare Tunnel to HostAnywhere or Ember-cli:


Connect your devices into a single secure private WireGuard®-based mesh network with SSO/MFA and manage access with just a few clicks.
Compare NetBird to HostAnywhere or Ember-cli:
