Software Alternatives & Startups

Horos VS CloudLinux

Compare Horos VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

Horos

A free, open source 64-bit DICOM medical image viewer

Rating
0 reviews
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Horos seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 0
Graphic Design Software popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Horos
CloudLinux
Website horosproject.org cloudlinux.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Horos 5 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • Open Source
    Horos is free and open-source, allowing users to access and modify the source code for customization and integration with other systems.
  • Cross-Platform
    It is designed to work on macOS, providing a native experience for Mac users, and integrates well with the Apple ecosystem.
  • DICOM Support
    Horos supports DICOM imaging format, making it suitable for viewing and analyzing medical images from various imaging devices.
  • Extensive Features
    The software offers a wide range of features, such as 3D reconstructions, image segmentation, and measurement tools, which are essential for medical diagnostics.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, Horos has a community of users and developers who contribute to its development, providing support and regular updates.

Possible disadvantages

  • MacOS Limitation
    Horos is specifically designed for macOS, limiting its usability for users who work on Windows or Linux operating systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Users who are not familiar with DICOM or medical imaging software might find it challenging to learn initially due to its comprehensive features.
  • Limited Professional Support
    As an open-source project, it may not offer the same level of professional support or reliability as some commercial medical imaging solutions.
  • Performance Concerns
    Depending on the system specifications and the complexity of the images being processed, some users may experience performance issues or slower image processing speeds.
  • Dependency on Community Updates
    The software largely depends on community contributions for updates and bug fixes, which may not be as frequent or regular as those from a commercial entity.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Horos
CloudLinux

No analysis of Horos yet.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Horos 3 videos + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

Volux - Tutorial Horos Viewer

More videos

  • - Horos Meetup #1 - 03.06.15
  • - Horos AM - Tesis de inversión de Keck Seng Investments. Actualización septiembre 2019

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Horos
CloudLinux
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Horos and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Horos 6 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • Top 5 DICOM Viewers
    2. Horos - platforms: MacOS, top 1 if you use macOS. The same user-friendly interface and very rich toolset (multiplanar reconstruction, maximum intensity projections, volume rendering. It also has tools for manipulating images and... Source: about 4 years ago
  • Lots of comments (here/elsewhere) mentioning CCW. Just had a new ceph taken. CBCT scan indicated narrow airway (<5 mm). Any casual thoughts before surgical consult next week?
    Seems a little small for a CBCT... Yeah I would ask for the raw DICOM files. Should be able to open that on Mac using Horos. https://horosproject.org/. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Help! Accessing files on UDF Volume for medical results
    I had an MRI done a couple of years ago, and I found some free software that works very well: Https://horosproject.org/. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Horos and CloudLinux

When comparing Horos and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.