
AlgoBacktest
Options Backtesting Engine
Portfolio Backtest
Backtrader
ETFreplay.com
GreeksLab
QuantConnect
A backtester built to catch strategies that only work on paper

Bubble.io
NoCode.tech
Pipedream
Adalo
Sheety
Paragon
No Code MBA
Build third-party application APIs with NoCode
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, NoCodeAPI seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | honestbacktester.com | nocodeapi.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Ireland | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Most backtests flatter you — great numbers in, great numbers out. Honest Backtest Engine is built to do the opposite: it tests your strategy on data it never saw, models real commission, slippage and borrow, deflates the Sharpe for how many combinations you tried, and Monte-Carlo stress-tests the...
No description of NoCodeAPI yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Honest Backtest Engine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Nocodeapi.com Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Honest Backtest Engine and NoCodeAPI.
Honest Backtest Engine's answer
Most backtesting tools are built to make a strategy look good. Honest Backtest Engine is built to do the opposite — to catch the strategy that only works on paper before you risk real money on it. Every run headlines out-of-sample results, charges real trading costs, deflates the Sharpe ratio for how many parameter combinations you tried, and Monte-Carlo stress-tests the outcome. It ends in a single believability score from 0 to 100, and it shows you the checks your strategy failed, not just the ones it passed. No other tool leads with the red marks.
Honest Backtest Engine's answer
It was built out of a common, painful experience: strategies that backtest beautifully and then quietly lose money live. That gap is almost always caused by overfitting, ignored costs, look-ahead bias, or a single lucky run mistaken for an edge — and most backtesting tools do nothing to catch it. Honest Backtest Engine exists to run those checks automatically and to be honest about the result, even when the honest answer is "this edge probably isn't real."
Honest Backtest Engine's answer
Because it's designed to tell you the truth rather than flatter you. It models real commission, slippage and borrow costs, it's look-ahead-proof, and it produces a tamper-evident signed report anyone can verify without trusting you. It runs entirely on your own machine — your data and strategies never leave your computer. It's a one-time €149 purchase with every future version included, no subscription. And it comes with a guarantee: if it doesn't catch a backtest that was lying to you within 30 days, you get a full refund.
Honest Backtest Engine's answer
Retail and independent algorithmic traders who build and backtest their own strategies — especially anyone who has watched a great-looking backtest lose money in live trading and wants to know whether an edge is real before funding an account. It suits people comfortable with concepts like Sharpe ratio, overfitting and out-of-sample testing, though the reports are written to be readable without a quant background.
Honest Backtest Engine's answer
Python, with pandas and NumPy for the backtesting engine and data handling. Reports and the local interface are rendered as HTML in the browser. Reports are cryptographically signed using Ed25519 so they can be independently verified. It runs as a self-contained local application on Windows, Mac and Linux.
Share your experience with using Honest Backtest Engine and NoCodeAPI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Honest Backtest Engine since Jul 2026.
So far I've researched about nocodeapi.com, Airbyte Open Source, Singer.io and integrate.io, which I'll be testing during the week and sharing my findings. Source: about 3 years ago
I think the product is literally called "NoCodeAPI." It's still available: https://nocodeapi.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
This guy has a bunch of projects on https://mvpstack.io/ as well, some sort of portfolio I guess. None of them work properly; no finished projects that are currently functional as far as I can tell. He claims to have sold off some of his... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
When comparing Honest Backtest Engine and NoCodeAPI, you can also consider the following products.

AI-powered trading backtesting software, no code required.
Compare AlgoBacktest to Honest Backtest Engine or NoCodeAPI:

Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.
Compare Bubble.io to Honest Backtest Engine or NoCodeAPI:

Powerful yet easy to use backtesting engine for option traders.
Compare Options Backtesting Engine to Honest Backtest Engine or NoCodeAPI:

Free tools & resources for non-tech makers and entrepreneurs
Compare NoCode.tech to Honest Backtest Engine or NoCodeAPI:

Create portfolio backtests quickly and easily by describing them in plain English. Our AI will find the relevant Stocks or ETFs and create the backtest for you.
Compare Portfolio Backtest to Honest Backtest Engine or NoCodeAPI:

Integration platform for developers
Compare Pipedream to Honest Backtest Engine or NoCodeAPI: