
BugBug.io
Cypress.io
testRigor
DogQ.io
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
Testsigma
browserling
AI QA agent that tests your app like real user

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | hitest.ai | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Meet HiTest, your AI QA agent. Spend less time on repetitive testing. Let AI explore your product and create test cases, record a flow in Live View, upload a recording, or import cases from Excel. Write tests in natural language—no code required. Run them in a real browser and investigate...
No description of ShellNewHandler yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of HiTest yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing HiTest and ShellNewHandler.
HiTest's answer
HiTest brings AI-assisted test creation, real-browser execution, and failure investigation into one workflow. Describe a user journey in plain language or record a browser flow, review the resulting test cases, and run them as repeatable checks. Failed steps stay connected to run summaries, screenshots and recordings when available, so teams can turn regressions into actionable issues.
HiTest's answer
Choose HiTest if your team wants repeatable coverage for important web-app journeys without writing a test script for every flow. Product, engineering, support, and QA teams can create and review tests around workflows they already understand, such as onboarding, checkout, and permissions. Run test plans manually, on a schedule, or from deployment webhooks, then use the attached failure evidence to investigate regressions.
HiTest's answer
HiTest is designed for fast-moving product teams, especially SaaS, marketplace, internal-tool, and workflow automation teams that need repeatable checks for logged-in user journeys. Its primary users include founders, developers, QA engineers, product managers, and support teams who need to check critical flows and understand failures before the next release.
HiTest's answer
HiTest is built with TypeScript, React, and Next.js. It combines AI agents with cloud-hosted real-browser sessions for test exploration and execution. PostgreSQL and Drizzle handle application data, Trigger.dev runs background workflows, and Socket.IO supports real-time browser-session updates.
HiTest's answer
We are building HiTest because software teams are shipping faster, while manual QA and end-to-end test maintenance often struggle to keep up. Important flows can be checked too late, and failures can be difficult to reproduce. Our goal is to make regression testing easier to start, repeat, and debug: teams describe or record the journeys that matter, run them regularly, and review failures with the evidence needed to act. HiTest is operated by Dovdo Inc.
Share your experience with using HiTest and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking HiTest since Sep 2026.
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing HiTest and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.

BugBug makes web test automation simple. Create E2E tests with an intuitive no-code recorder or AI agents. With cloud runs, schedules, and reports built in, your whole team can own regression testing without managing infrastructure.
Compare BugBug.io to HiTest or ShellNewHandler:

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
Compare Cypress.io to HiTest or ShellNewHandler:

Use plain English to build stable and maintainable functional end-to-end tests.
Compare testRigor to HiTest or ShellNewHandler:

No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels
Compare DogQ.io to HiTest or ShellNewHandler:

World’s first full-stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform.
Compare TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) to HiTest or ShellNewHandler:

Complete AI-driven Test Automation platform for Web apps, Mobile apps and APIs. Simple English commands to automate complex tests easily and effectively with all the flexibility that enterprise teams need!
Compare Testsigma to HiTest or ShellNewHandler: