Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

HHVM VS socketify.py

Compare HHVM VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

CloudCLI
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

HHVM logo HHVM

HHVM is an open-source virtual machine designed for executing programs written in Hack and PHP.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • HHVM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

HHVM features and specs

  • Performance
    HHVM uses Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation to convert PHP code into machine code, which can significantly improve execution speed compared to traditional PHP interpreters.
  • Hack Language Support
    HHVM supports the Hack programming language, which offers additional features like static type checking, generics, and asynchronous code execution, allowing developers to write safer and more efficient code.
  • Scalability
    HHVM is designed to handle high-traffic environments, making it suitable for large-scale applications and websites with high concurrency demands.
  • Open Source
    HHVM is open-source software, allowing developers to contribute to its development and benefit from community-driven improvements and support.

Possible disadvantages of HHVM

  • Compatibility
    HHVM is not fully compatible with all PHP extensions and libraries. This can create issues when migrating existing PHP applications to HHVM, requiring additional refactoring.
  • Resource Intensive
    HHVM can consume more memory and CPU resources than traditional PHP interpreters, which might be a concern for applications running on limited hardware.
  • Linux Focused
    HHVM primarily supports Linux-based systems. While there is some support for other operating systems, it may not be as robust, limiting its use in heterogeneous environments.
  • Evolving Technology
    HHVM and the Hack language are continuously evolving, which can lead to breaking changes and the need to keep development teams updated with the latest features and fixes.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of HHVM

Overall verdict

  • In recent years, HHVM has shifted focus more towards supporting Hack rather than full PHP compatibility. While it was once a popular option for running PHP applications efficiently, many projects now recommend sticking to PHP 7.x or later, which has seen significant performance improvements. Therefore, HHVM is considered good if you're specifically using Hack, but might not be the best choice for standard PHP applications.

Why this product is good

  • HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine) was originally developed by Facebook to provide improved performance for PHP applications. It offers features like a just-in-time (JIT) compiler and compatibility with Hack, Facebook's PHP dialect. It has been praised for enhancing the speed of PHP execution, particularly for large-scale applications.

Recommended for

    HHVM is recommended for organizations or projects that primarily use Hack or have legacy systems built around it. It can also be beneficial for enterprises looking to leverage its performance benefits in a Hack environment. However, for new projects or those focused solely on PHP, sticking with the latest PHP versions is advisable.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

HHVM videos

+ Add

HHVM GLIMPSE MEME REVIEW||HARI HARA VEERA MALLU MEME REVIEW||POWER STAR..!

More videos:

  • Review - HHVM Performance Status - Hack Dev Day
  • Review - Scaling PHP-based Development with HHVM and Hack

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HHVM and socketify.py)

HHVM

socketify.py

DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Python
0 0%
Python
100% 100
Continuous Integration And Delivery
100 100%
Continuous Integration And Delivery
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
Web Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using HHVM and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HHVM should be more popular than socketify.py. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HHVM mentions (7)

  • GraphQL vs REST: 18 Claims Fact-Checked with Primary Sources (2026)
    Facebook ran a massive PHP codebase, scaled through HipHop (a PHP-to-C++ transpiler) and later HHVM (a just-in-time compiler for PHP). Keith Adams , Facebook's Chief Architect and HHVM team lead, describes how Facebook scaled a large, unified PHP application in Software Engineering Daily interviews and InfoQ presentations . - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • THT v0.8.1 โ€“ A modern re-design of PHP
    $hayStack.contains('needle') This looks more or less like a new language ? It must be amazing amount of time and energy to rewrite PHP in to this. I don't see the benefits. I understand the Facebook's HHVM had some. (https://hhvm.com/) Or Swoole (https://openswoole.com/) has it. But I'm not clear of THT (also typical apple vs oranges benchamrkTM included). 2cents. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • I know that's the name of the language, I'm asking about the first P
    PHP is nearly as old as the web. Change the conversation and say: I use Hack on the Hip Hop Virtual Machine. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Nvidia is now worth more than Meta
    Meta has created/maintains ReactJS, Zstandard, IO_Uring, PyTorch, HHVM, is a member of Rust foundation, and that's only the things I know about. They've literally made the Web and Linux better and faster. Source: over 4 years ago
  • does a php-like Typescript exist?
    Have you looked into Hacklang / HHVM at all. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HHVM and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

Packer - Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Red Hat OpenShift - Application and Data, Application Hosting, and Platform as a Service

RunDeck - RunDeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI.

Loading...