Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Heroku CI VS Dependency CI

Compare Heroku CI VS Dependency CI and see what are their differences

Heroku CI logo Heroku CI

Continuous Integration from Heroku

Dependency CI logo Dependency CI

Continuous testing for your application's dependencies
  • Heroku CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • Dependency CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27

Heroku CI features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Heroku CI is tightly integrated with Heroku Pipelines, making it easy to deploy successfully tested builds directly into different stages, streamlining the deployment process.
  • Easy Setup
    Heroku CI provides a straightforward setup process, particularly for existing Heroku applications. This makes it accessible for teams who are already using Heroku for their application hosting.
  • Ephemeral Test Environments
    Heroku CI automatically provisions and tears down application environments for tests, ensuring a clean state for each test run and reducing the likelihood of false positives/negatives caused by environment differences.
  • Built-in Support for Multiple Languages
    Offers native support for a variety of programming languages supported by Heroku, allowing diverse teams to implement CI processes without additional configuration.
  • Parallel Test Execution
    Enables parallel execution of test suites, which can significantly reduce overall testing time and speed up the development and deployment cycles.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku CI

  • Cost
    Heroku CI can be expensive for teams or projects that require many CI environments or frequent builds, as it operates on Heroku's dyno cost model.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to more robust CI/CD tools, Heroku CI offers less flexibility and customization options, which might be restrictive for complex build processes or unique testing requirements.
  • Integration Limitations
    While Heroku CI integrates well with Heroku Pipelines, it may not offer the same level of integration or support for other popular CI/CD tools and services, potentially complicating mixed-environment setups.
  • Performance Limitations
    The performance of the CI process is tied to the dyno types utilized in Heroku, and can be limited by the dyno configurations, impacting the speed and efficiency of running tests.
  • Dependency on Heroku Ecosystem
    Heroku CI is primarily beneficial if you are already using Heroku for deployment, which may not be suitable for teams relying on different cloud providers or those seeking vendor independence.

Dependency CI features and specs

  • Automated Dependency Checks
    Dependency CI automatically checks project dependencies for issues such as security vulnerabilities, licensing problems, and conflicts, helping maintain the health of a project.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Easily integrates into existing CI/CD workflows, allowing teams to include dependency checks as part of their continuous integration and deployment processes.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Offers support for a variety of programming languages and package managers, making it versatile for projects with dependencies across different ecosystems.
  • Early Issue Detection
    By identifying potential issues in dependencies early in the development process, it helps developers address these problems before they affect production.

Possible disadvantages of Dependency CI

  • Service Stability
    As with any third-party service, there can be concerns about availability, reliability, or potential termination of the service.
  • Limited Customization
    The platform might offer limited customization options for checks and reports, which could be a challenge for projects with unique requirements.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Integrating a third-party service into development workflows can raise privacy and data security concerns, especially for sensitive projects.
  • Learning Curve
    Team members may need to invest time in learning how to effectively use and configure Dependency CI as part of their workflow.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku CI and Dependency CI)
Developer Tools
62 62%
38% 38
Continuous Integration
64 64%
36% 36
Continuous Deployment
60 60%
40% 40
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku CI and Dependency CI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku CI and Dependency CI, you can also consider the following products

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Nevercode - Continuous integration & delivery for mobile apps made easy. Build, test & release native & cross-platform apps faster with Nevercode. Sign up for free.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Semaphore - Semaphore is a fully managed, high performance testing and deployment solution for your company. A Continuous Integration tool.

Ozone - Ozone offers a Modern CI/CD platform that benefits organizations through hassle-free deployments for both stateful and stateless applications at scale.

Bitrise - Tens of thousands of agencies, startups and enterprise companies with mobile apps - including Runkeeper, Grindr, Duolingo and more - use Bitrise to automate their way to increased productivity & speed