Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Hazel VS Shutter

Compare Hazel VS Shutter and see what are their differences

ScreenSnap Pro
Stop sharing plain, boring screenshots. Add stunning backgrounds, pro annotations, and instant cloud links โ€” all in one click. Pay once, own it forever. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Hazel logo Hazel

Lighweight update server for Electron apps

Shutter logo Shutter

Shutter is a feature-rich screenshot program.
  • Hazel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12
  • Shutter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-04

Hazel features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    Hazel is designed to be easily integrated into existing Electron applications, providing a straightforward way to manage updates for desktop apps.
  • Auto-update functionality
    Hazel provides built-in support for automatic updates, which can greatly enhance the user experience by ensuring that end-users always have the latest version without manual intervention.
  • Simple Configuration
    The setup and configuration of Hazel are relatively simple, making it accessible for developers who may not have extensive experience with update systems.
  • GitHub Releases Support
    Hazel is tightly integrated with GitHub releases, allowing developers to use GitHub as a distribution server, which simplifies the release process.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project under the Vercel organization, Hazel benefits from community contributions and transparent development practices.

Possible disadvantages of Hazel

  • Limited Customization
    While Hazel is easy to set up, it offers limited customization options compared to more complex update management solutions, which could be a drawback for advanced use cases.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    Hazel's reliance on GitHub for release hosting may be a limitation for teams that use other repository hosting services or prefer to host their updates independently.
  • Scale Limitations
    For larger applications or those with significant distribution needs, Hazel might not scale as effectively as more robust, enterprise-grade update management systems.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    The frequency and responsiveness of updates and maintenance can be inconsistent, which may impact its reliability if critical issues arise.
  • Compatibility
    Hazel is primarily designed for Electron applications and may not be suitable or easily adaptable for non-Electron environments.

Shutter features and specs

  • Comprehensive Screenshot Options
    Shutter provides a wide variety of screenshot options including full screen, window, selection, and even web page capturing, making it versatile for different user needs.
  • Built-in Editor
    The built-in editor allows users to add annotations, shapes, and text to screenshots directly within Shutter, reducing the need for additional software.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Shutter features an intuitive and user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and utilize its functions efficiently.
  • Plugin Support
    Shutter supports various plugins to extend its functionality, such as uploading screenshots to image hosting sites or integrating with other software.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Shutter is available for multiple Linux distributions, making it accessible for a large number of Linux users.

Possible disadvantages of Shutter

  • Limited to Linux
    Shutter is only available for Linux platforms, which excludes users on Windows and macOS from using the software.
  • Outdated Dependencies
    Some users have reported issues with outdated dependencies, which can cause compatibility problems with newer Linux distributions.
  • Development Stagnation
    The development of Shutter has slowed down in recent years, leading to fewer updates and potentially lacking some modern features that users might expect.
  • Installation Complexity
    Installing Shutter on certain Linux distributions can be complex and may require the user to manually resolve dependencies or add third-party repositories.
  • Heavy Resource Usage
    Shutter can be resource-intensive compared to other lightweight screenshot tools, which might affect performance on older or less powerful systems.

Analysis of Hazel

Overall verdict

  • Hazel is a well-regarded tool for developers looking to implement distributed computing solutions. It is particularly favored for its reliability and performance in handling complex data processing tasks. Hence, Hazel can be considered a good choice for projects that require distributed architecture.

Why this product is good

  • Hazel is considered good because it acts as an open-source framework for building robust and scalable distributed applications and services. It's known for its distributed architecture, support for real-time data processing, and ease of integration with other tools and systems. Furthermore, Hazel offers high availability, automated failover, and partitioned data structures, making it suitable for critical applications.

Recommended for

  • Developers building distributed applications
  • Teams needing real-time data processing capabilities
  • Systems architects looking for scalable infrastructure solutions
  • Projects requiring automated failover and high availability

Analysis of Shutter

Overall verdict

  • Good

Why this product is good

  • Shutter is a feature-rich screenshot tool that provides a variety of options for capturing images, such as full screen, specific windows, or custom selections. It also includes an integrated editor for annotating screenshots, which can be handy for creating instructional content. Its user-friendly interface and ability to handle file uploads make it a practical choice for many users.

Recommended for

    Shutter is recommended for users who need a versatile screenshot tool with editing capabilities, especially those creating tutorials, guides, or any visual content that requires annotations. It's also suitable for those who prefer an open-source solution available on Linux platforms.

Hazel videos

+ Add

Big Bulky Blast from the Past - MG 1/100 Gundam TR-1 Hazel Review - MECHA GAIKOTSU

More videos:

  • Review - HGUC Gundam TR-1 Hazel Custom (Review)
  • Review - HGUC Gundam TR-1 Hazel II (Review)

Shutter videos

+ Add

Shutter - Modern Horror Season Review | GizmoCh

More videos:

  • Review - Yoyofactory Shutter Review
  • Review - Shutter (2008) Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hazel and Shutter)

Hazel

Shutter

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Screenshot Annotation
0 0%
Screenshot Annotation
100% 100
File Management
100 100%
File Management
0% 0
Screenshots
0 0%
Screenshots
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hazel and Shutter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Hazel and Shutter

Hazel Reviews

We have no reviews of Hazel yet.
Be the first one to post

Shutter Reviews

Top 13 Free Snagit Alternatives For 2021
Hey, Ubuntu /Linux users! Have we got an app for you! Shutter swings in to attempt to help you capture your computer screen. If youโ€™re looking for a simple Linux screenshot tool , this could be it.
Source: screenrec.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Shutter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hazel mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Hazel yet. Tracking of Hazel recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Shutter mentions (7)

  • What is the name of the default screenshot tool in PopOS?
    Hey I use "shutter" https://shutter-project.org/ which has a nice blur option. Source: over 3 years ago
  • ShareX alternative for Linux?
    I also used Flameshot and Shutter. Shutter was very feature rich, and I think it's the closest in terms of having the same workflow actions as ShareX -- I don't think it fully supports Wayland yet though and has a TON of dependencies. Flameshot has had issues with Wayland and IMHO as of now most of its features has been implemented in native screencaptures (and if you need the tray icon, I think on Gnome there's... Source: over 3 years ago
  • A app to take long/scrolling screenshots?
    Maybe look into Shutter but it can only screenshot scrolling webpages no any other windows. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Alternative to shotwell for handling screenshots but with the possibility to draw onto the image?
    Shutter (https://shutter-project.org) is a very good tool for creating and editing screenshots. Source: over 3 years ago
  • I'm looking for a pc app that allows you to capture your screen.
    At home on my own PC, I use something called "Shutter" https://shutter-project.org/. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hazel and Shutter, you can also consider the following products

Organize - The file management automation software.

Greenshot - Greenshot is a free and open source screenshot tool that allows annotation and highlighting using the built-in image editor.

ImageOptim - Faster web pages and apps.

Snipping Tool - Use Snipping Tool to capture a screen shot, or snip, of any object on your screen, and then annotate, save, or share the image

DropIt - Application to automatically process and organize your files, to move, compress, extract, rename, delete, list, send by mail, encrypt, etc. DropItDownload DropIt for free.

MWSnap - MWSnap is basically a free to use Windows snapping tools that are used for snapping any part of the screen that is currently displaying on the front of all opened programs and windows.

Loading...