
Pastebin.com
PrivateBin
GitHub Gist
Rentry.co
JustPaste.it
Write.as
shelf.gg
Pad editor for source code.

Coassemble
Trainn.co
Build courses by API, drop them into your product with one iframe, and get told who finished. No portal, no learner accounts, priced per course view.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, hastebin seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | toptal.com | underlayerhq.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of hastebin yet.
Underlayer is headless, API-first training for SaaS products. Instead of sending your users to a separate LMS portal, you generate a course, embed it where they already work, and get every completion sent back to your own systems. How it works Create a course. Generate one from a doc or a prompt...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Hastebin is particularly recommended for developers and anyone else who needs a fast, no-frills way to share text and code snippets without the overhead of account creation or the complexities of larger platforms. It's ideal for quick debugging sessions, code reviews, and other temporary sharing needs.
No analysis of Underlayer yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No hastebin videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Underlayer demo
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing hastebin and Underlayer.
Underlayer's answer:
it's pre-launching
Underlayer's answer:
Underlayer is training with no portal. You build a course by API, by MCP, or in the visual builder, and add it to your product with one iframe. Then signed webhooks tell your systems who finished. Learners never create an account or leave your app, and the player uses your theme, so it looks like part of your product. We charge per course view, not per seat, and every price and overage rate is published.
Underlayer's answer:
Most course tools, like Coassemble, Trainn and LearningStudioAI, assume training happens on their own site: learners sign up, log in and get enrolled, and you pay per seat. Underlayer takes the opposite approach:
No learner accounts. You pass in your own user IDs and we track progress against them. Built for developers. A full REST API covers every resource, and an MCP server lets AI agents create and edit courses. Results in your own tools. Signed webhooks send completions to your CRM, your product or your data warehouse. SCORM 1.2 and 2004 export for customers who still need to load courses into an LMS. Public pricing. Plans start at $149/month for 25,000 course views, with unlimited learners and no sales call required.
Underlayer's answer:
SaaS product, customer success and engineering teams who want onboarding, product education or compliance training inside their own app. It also suits platforms that train other people's users, like partner networks, marketplaces and field-ops tools, where a separate LMS login gets in the way.
Underlayer's answer:
Every company putting training in front of its users hit the same wall: the LMS wanted to own the learner. That meant a separate portal, a second login and a per-seat bill for people who never opened a course. We built Underlayer as the layer underneath instead. You keep the product and the user relationship. We handle building the course, playing it and tracking progress, and we stay out of the way.
Underlayer's answer:
Next.js 16 (App Router) with React 19 and TypeScript, Tailwind CSS v4, and Supabase (Postgres with row-level security, Auth and Storage). Claude from Anthropic generates courses with AI. Stripe handles billing and Resend sends email. There is also a remote MCP server with OAuth 2.1 for AI-agent access.
Share your experience with using hastebin and Underlayer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


There's a guide on the subreddit wiki on how to format code for display on reddit. When in doubt, you can also use GitHub Gist or Hastebin, though. Source: over 4 years ago
In future, use code formatting or put your code into hastebin.com and then post a link here. It will make it easier to read. Source: almost 5 years ago
If you want to post a log, you'll have to generate one first (go to settings > logging and set both logging verbosities to 0-debug and 'log to file' to ON, then do whatever you need to do to create the offending behavior; that should... Source: almost 5 years ago
Tracking Underlayer since Sep 2026.
When comparing hastebin and Underlayer, you can also consider the following products.

Pastebin.com is a website where you can store text for a certain period of time.
Compare Pastebin.com to hastebin or Underlayer:

Coassemble is an all-in-one, online training tool that connects people with the information they need – anytime, anyplace.
Compare Coassemble to hastebin or Underlayer:

PrivateBin is a minimalist, open source online pastebin where the server has zero knowledge of...
Compare PrivateBin to hastebin or Underlayer:

Trainn is a Customer Education platform for SaaS companies of all sizes to onboard and train customers, at scale, using product training & how-to videos, feature walkthroughs, and a dedicated customer training Academy.
Compare Trainn.co to hastebin or Underlayer:

Gist is a simple way to share snippets and pastes with others.
Compare GitHub Gist to hastebin or Underlayer:

Markdown pastebin/publishing service with preview, custom urls and editing. Fast, simple and free.
Compare Rentry.co to hastebin or Underlayer: