Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Hammer.js VS assertpy

Compare Hammer.js VS assertpy and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the full-stack, AI-powered product visualization platform, 100% online. Turn any image into 3D in seconds, enhance your visuals with AI, and download your work or share it as interactive 3D or AR in a snap, without a line of code. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

Hammer.js logo Hammer.js

Hammer is an open-source library that can recognize gestures made by touch, mouse and pointer events.

assertpy logo assertpy

A straightforward assertion library for Python.
  • Hammer.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-27
  • assertpy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-06

Hammer.js features and specs

  • Touch Gesture Support
    Hammer.js is specifically designed to handle touch gestures, making it easier to implement complex multi-touch interactions like swipes, pinches, and rotations without relying on native touch events.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively small in size, which means it won't significantly increase the load time or bandwidth usage of web applications.
  • Ease of Use
    Hammer.js provides a simple API that abstracts away the complexity of different input types, allowing developers to add gesture support with minimal setup and code.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Hammer.js is designed to work consistently across various platforms and devices, ensuring that touch interactions behave similarly on different browsers and operating systems.

Possible disadvantages of Hammer.js

  • Limited to Gestures
    While Hammer.js excels at gesture recognition, it is not a comprehensive solution for all touch events, so developers might need to use additional libraries or custom code for other touch features.
  • Performance Overheads
    In complex applications with many touch interactions, Hammer.js could introduce performance overhead, potentially leading to slower touch responses if not optimized properly.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    Hammer.js is not as actively maintained as some other libraries, which could result in longer periods without updates or fixes for emerging issues and compatibility challenges.
  • Dependence on jQuery (for some features)
    Some implementations or extended features of Hammer.js may require jQuery, which can be a disadvantage for projects that do not use jQuery or aim to minimize external dependencies.

assertpy features and specs

  • Fluent API
    Assertpy offers a fluent API that makes assertions more readable and expressive, enabling developers to write assertions in a natural language style that is easy to understand.
  • Chainable Assertions
    It allows for chainable assertions, enabling multiple checks to be performed in a single line of code, thereby reducing verbosity and enhancing clarity.
  • Comprehensive Assertion Methods
    The library provides a wide range of built-in assertion methods, catering to various types of data validations, such as checking for size, type, value, and more.
  • Extensibility
    Assertpy supports extending its functionality by defining custom assertions, allowing developers to tailor it to their specific needs.
  • Pythonic
    Designed with Pythonic principles in mind, Assertpy fits seamlessly into Python projects, enabling idiomatic and consistent code style.

Possible disadvantages of assertpy

  • Learning Curve
    Developers new to the library may encounter a learning curve due to the distinct approach of using fluent and chainable assertions as opposed to traditional methods.
  • Limited by Python Version
    The library may have limitations in terms of compatibility with older versions of Python, requiring users to ensure their environment is up-to-date.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional abstraction layer introduced by a fluent interface might introduce some performance overhead, especially in performance-critical or resource-constrained environments.
  • Less Community Support
    Compared to more established testing libraries, Assertpy might have less community support and fewer resources available for resolving issues or getting help.
  • Dependency Management
    Using a third-party library introduces additional dependencies to manage, which could complicate project maintenance and compatibility.

Analysis of assertpy

Overall verdict

  • assertpy is a well-regarded, lightweight assertion library for Python that provides a fluent, chainable API for writing readable and expressive test assertions, making it a solid choice for improving test clarity.

Why this product is good

  • Offers a fluent, chainable assertion syntax that makes tests more readable and self-documenting
  • Comprehensive built-in assertions for strings, numbers, lists, dicts, files, dates, and more
  • Produces clear, descriptive failure messages that speed up debugging
  • Lightweight with minimal dependencies and easy to integrate into existing test suites
  • Framework-agnostic, working seamlessly with pytest, unittest, and other test runners
  • Actively maintained open-source project with good documentation and community support

Recommended for

  • Python developers who want more readable and expressive test assertions
  • Teams using pytest or unittest looking to enhance assertion clarity
  • Projects that value descriptive failure messages for faster debugging
  • Developers coming from fluent assertion libraries in other languages (like AssertJ or Chai)
  • QA engineers and testers writing maintainable, self-documenting test code

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hammer.js and assertpy)

Hammer.js

assertpy

Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Python
0 0%
Python
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Hammer.js and assertpy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hammer.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hammer.js mentions (7)

  • Tattooing The Black Keys Fans Using MediaDevices and PixiJS
    Originally, I used HammerJS to allow the user to use their fingers to do this but I found it rather difficult to use two fingers and try to capture a photo of myself. Itโ€™s a bit easier to simply hold my phone firmly and use the sliders to adjust. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Make Drag & Drop + DropZone with interact.js + reactjs
    Actually, I thought if I used hammerjs, it would be easy, but actually I gave up using that since it seemed that hammerjs's development wasn't active any more unfortunately. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Can i build this with wordpress plugin or editor?
    Looking at https://delassus.com/javascripts/app.js you can see they used hammer.js(https://hammerjs.github.io/) to achieve the gestures, which I am assuming is your focus here. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Best 10 Amazing Javascript Libraries
    Hammer.js is a library and gives you the ability to add touch gestures on websites. It means it can recognize & track gestures performed by the fingers and mouse of the user and make animations and all that cool stuff. And you can know the steps on their website here. Source: about 5 years ago
  • Wireworld! Svelte Edition
    I had no idea how bad listening for things like key presses and dragging events are today. Given how nice and fairly standard a lot of the APIs across browsers and platforms have become, I was shocked at how rough this space is. I think if I had to do this again, this will be one area where I defer to a library (like hammer.js). - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
View more

assertpy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of assertpy yet. Tracking of assertpy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hammer.js and assertpy, you can also consider the following products

Leap Motion - Reach into the future of virtual and augmented reality with the most advanced hand tracking on Earth, used by over 300,000 developers worldwide.

grappa - grappa is an declarative, verbose, and expressive assertion library for Python.

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

360ยฐ media - 360 Media is a boutique public relations, digital marketing and event-planning agency in Atlanta specializing in lifestyle, entertainment and hospitality.

Project Play - Project Play, an initiative of the Aspen Institute, helps stakeholders build healthy communities through sports. Every child in America should have quality access to sports.

Sketchbox - Sketchbox is an online platform that offers innovative VR training and assessment solutions for companies, universities, and communities.

Loading...