Software Alternatives & Startups

gping (CLI) VS SOLUS Sky

Compare gping (CLI) VS SOLUS Sky and see what are their differences

gping (CLI)

Ping, but with a graph. Contribute to orf/gping development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rating
0 reviews
SOLUS Sky

A live, native Mac view of your Starlink connection and the satellites passing overhead.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Monitoring Tools popularity
72% vs 28%
alternatives listed
31 vs 3

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

gping (CLI)
SOLUS Sky
Website github.com solussky.com
Platforms —
macOS (Mac App Store)
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

gping (CLI) 5 features
SOLUS Sky 5 features
  • Visual real-time graphing
    gping provides a real-time, terminal-based graph of ping latency over time, making it easy to visually spot trends, spikes, and packet loss at a glance — something the standard ping command cannot do.
  • Multi-host comparison
    You can ping multiple hosts simultaneously and see their latency graphs side by side in the same terminal window, which is extremely useful for comparing network paths or diagnosing routing issues.
  • Cross-platform support
    gping is available on Linux, macOS, and Windows, and can be installed via popular package managers like Homebrew, Chocolatey, Scoop, and various Linux package managers, making it accessible on virtually any platform.
  • Simple and intuitive CLI
    The tool is very easy to use with minimal configuration required. Just run 'gping <host>' and you immediately get a useful visual output. The command-line flags are straightforward and well-documented.
  • Supports arbitrary command graphing
    Beyond just pinging hosts, gping can graph the execution time of arbitrary commands using the --cmd flag, making it a versatile tool for monitoring the performance of any repeatable command over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Requires installation of additional binary
    Unlike the standard ping command which is pre-installed on virtually every operating system, gping must be separately downloaded and installed, which may not be feasible in locked-down or minimal server environments.
  • Limited data export and logging
    gping is primarily a visual tool and lacks robust options for exporting ping data to files or structured formats (like CSV or JSON) for later analysis, making it less suitable for long-term monitoring or automated reporting.
  • Terminal size dependency
    The quality and usefulness of the graph depends heavily on terminal window size. In small terminal windows, the graph can become compressed and hard to read, losing much of the visual advantage over standard ping.
  • No alerting or threshold features
    gping does not support configuring alerts or notifications when latency exceeds a certain threshold or packet loss occurs, limiting its usefulness as a proactive monitoring tool compared to dedicated network monitoring solutions.
  • Resource overhead compared to standard ping
    As a graphical TUI application, gping consumes more CPU and memory than the standard ping utility. While generally negligible on modern systems, this can matter on resource-constrained embedded devices or when running many instances.
  • Live dish telemetry
    Reads your Starlink dish over the local network, showing speeds, latency and obstructions in real time.
  • Sky and satellite view
    See the satellite serving you, its next handover, and the whole constellation overhead on a live map.
  • Aurora and space weather
    Live aurora forecast, Kp, solar wind and cloud cover for your location.
  • Off-grid power
    Tracks dish power draw, energy use, cost and battery runtime.
  • Works offline, no account
    Reads your dish locally with no login or setup, and keeps working even when your internet is down.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

gping (CLI)
SOLUS Sky

Overall verdict

  • gping is an excellent, lightweight open-source CLI tool that modernizes the classic ping command by adding a real-time graphical visualization of latency directly in your terminal, making it a favorite among developers and sysadmins.

Why this product is good

  • Displays ping latency as a live, scrolling graph right in the terminal for easy visual analysis
  • Supports pinging multiple hosts simultaneously and comparing their latency side by side
  • Cross-platform support for Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Written in Rust, making it fast, efficient, and reliable
  • Free and open-source with an active community and simple installation via common package managers
  • Can execute commands and graph their execution time, not just network pings

Recommended for

  • Network engineers and system administrators troubleshooting connectivity or latency issues
  • Developers who want a quick visual sense of network performance
  • Users who need to compare latency across multiple hosts at once
  • Anyone comfortable working in the command line who wants a more informative alternative to traditional ping

No analysis of SOLUS Sky yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
gping (CLI)
SOLUS Sky
72% 72%
28% 28%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing gping (CLI) and SOLUS Sky.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

SOLUS Sky's answer:

Native Apple frameworks only, Swift, SwiftUI and MapKit, with weather map tiles from OpenWeather. No third-party binaries or SDKs.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

SOLUS Sky's answer:

Starlink users who live and work by their connection, RVers, boaters, off-gridders and remote workers who want to see exactly what their dish and the sky are doing in real time.

What makes your product unique?

SOLUS Sky's answer:

he only native Mac app that shows your Starlink dish and the sky above it side by side, live telemetry from your own dish alongside the satellite serving you, obstructions, aurora and space weather, all reading locally with no account.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

SOLUS Sky's answer:

Fully native to the Mac, no web wrappers or third-party frameworks. Reads straight from your own dish on the local network with no login, keeps working when your internet is down, and combines connection data with the sky, satellites, aurora and off-grid power in one view.

What's the story behind your product?

SOLUS Sky's answer:

I'm a Starlink user and built SOLUS Sky to scratch my own itch, I wanted to actually see what my dish and the sky above it were doing in real time, and nothing did that on the Mac, so I made it.

User comments

Share your experience with using gping (CLI) and SOLUS Sky. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to gping (CLI) and SOLUS Sky

When comparing gping (CLI) and SOLUS Sky, you can also consider the following products.