Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Gource VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Gource VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Gource logo Gource

Gource is a software version control visualization tool.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Gource Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-01-03
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Gource features and specs

  • Visual Representation
    Gource creates visually appealing and dynamic animations that represent the historical development of a project. This can help teams see the progress and contributions over time in a way that's easy to understand.
  • Open-Source
    As an open-source tool, Gource is free to use and can be modified by developers to better fit their specific needs, offering flexibility and cost efficiency.
  • Cross-Platform
    Gource is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing it to be used in diverse development environments without compatibility issues.
  • Integration with Version Control
    Gource can integrate with popular version control systems like Git, Mercurial, Bazaar, and SVN, making it easy to visualize the development history in these systems.

Possible disadvantages of Gource

  • Learning Curve
    Understanding how to use Gource effectively might require a bit of time and effort, especially for users not familiar with command-line tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    Generating animations for large projects can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring significant CPU and memory usage, which might be problematic on lower-end machines.
  • Limited Interactivity
    While Gource provides a great visual representation of project history, it lacks interactivity, which can limit users’ ability to explore the data in depth directly within the tool.
  • Dependency on Version Control
    Since Gource relies on version control systems for data, it cannot be used effectively without a well-documented and consistent history in a supported version control system.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Gource videos

Godot Engine Git History – Gource Visualization

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gource and Commit Together by Github)
Developer Tools
44 44%
56% 56
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
GitHub
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Gource and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gource mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Gource yet. Tracking of Gource recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gource and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Visualizer - Enter user/repo and see the project visually

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

CodeFlower - CodeFlower visualizes source code repositories using an interactive tree.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Codeology - Open-source algorithm that visualizes GitHub projects

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful