Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Google Container Registry VS Google Persistent Disk

Compare Google Container Registry VS Google Persistent Disk and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Google Container Registry logo Google Container Registry

Google Container Registry offers private Docker image storage on Google Cloud Platform.

Google Persistent Disk logo Google Persistent Disk

Google Persistent Disk is a high performance block storage for the Google Cloud Platform.
  • Google Container Registry Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30
  • Google Persistent Disk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-27

Google Container Registry features and specs

  • Integration with Google Cloud Platform
    Google Container Registry (GCR) is tightly integrated with the Google Cloud Platform (GCP), allowing seamless interaction with other GCP services. This integration simplifies the deployment and management of containerized applications across Google's cloud services.
  • Security Features
    GCR provides advanced security features such as vulnerability scanning, IAM-based access control, and auditing capabilities, ensuring that container images are securely managed and accessed.
  • Scalability
    The service is designed to scale effortlessly along with your workloads, providing reliable performance no matter the number of images or size of the repositories.
  • Geo-Replication
    GCR offers multi-region support, enabling geo-replication of container images. This feature ensures low-latency access to container images and improves application availability in different geographic regions.
  • Native CI/CD Support
    GCR can be integrated with popular CI/CD tools like Google Cloud Build, making it easier to automate the building, testing, and deployment of containers.

Possible disadvantages of Google Container Registry

  • Pricing Complexity
    The pricing model for GCR can be complex due to factors such as network egress and storage costs, making it difficult for some users to estimate their expenses accurately.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    Compared to some other container registries, GCR might have fewer integrations with third-party tools and services, which could limit flexibility for some users.
  • Dependency on GCP
    Being inherently tied to Google Cloud Platform, users looking to operate in a multi-cloud environment may find GCR less suitable compared to more cloud-agnostic container registries.
  • Learning Curve
    Users not familiar with Google Cloud Platform may face a learning curve in understanding how to best leverage GCR, as it requires navigating GCP's broader ecosystem and tools.
  • Limited Native Support for Non-Docker Artifacts
    While Google Artifact Registry provides broader artifact support, GCR specifically focuses on Docker images, which might not meet the needs of teams looking to manage different types of artifacts.

Google Persistent Disk features and specs

  • High Durability
    Google Persistent Disk offers reliable storage with redundancy across multiple disks, ensuring data durability and reducing the risk of data loss.
  • Automatic Backups
    Supports automated snapshots for easy backup and recovery, allowing you to restore data to any point in time.
  • Scalability
    Easily scalable to accommodate growing storage needs. You can increase your storage capacity without downtime.
  • Integration with Google Cloud
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services for efficient management and utilization within the cloud ecosystem.
  • Performance
    Provides persistent, high-performance block storage suitable for a wide range of applications, including databases and high-traffic websites.

Possible disadvantages of Google Persistent Disk

  • Cost
    Pricing can become expensive, especially with large data sets or high IOPS requirements, compared to some other storage options.
  • Zonal Availability
    Dependent on the geographical location of the data center and may require particular configurations for applications needing multi-region failover support.
  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring persistent disks might be complex for users unfamiliar with Google Cloud's interface and services.
  • Performance Limits
    Though performance is generally high, it may have limitations, such as maximum IOPS and throughput, depending on the disk type and size.

Google Container Registry videos

+ Add

4 Connect Jenkins to google container registry. Kubernetes CI/CD course:The Ultimate English Edition

Google Persistent Disk videos

No Google Persistent Disk videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Container Registry and Google Persistent Disk)

Google Container Registry

Google Persistent Disk

Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100
Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Object Storage
0 0%
Object Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Container Registry and Google Persistent Disk. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Container Registry seems to be a lot more popular than Google Persistent Disk. While we know about 25 links to Google Container Registry, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Google Persistent Disk. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Container Registry mentions (25)

View more

Google Persistent Disk mentions (2)

  • SSDs Have Become Fast, Except in the Cloud
    This is untrue of Local SSD (https://cloud.google.com/local-ssd) in Google Cloud. Local SSDs are PCIe peripherals. There are also multiple Persistent Disk (https://cloud.google.com/persistent-disk) offerings that are backed by SSDs over the network. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • All your notes are stored in an open, unsecure, and unencryped format on the Remarkable cloud. Just so you know.
    Google uses several layers of encryption to protect customer data at rest. All customer content stored at rest is encrypted, without any action required from the customer, using one or more encryption mechanisms. All data stored in Google Cloud is encrypted at the storage level using AES256, with the exception of a small number of Persistent Disks created before 2015 that use AES128. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Container Registry and Google Persistent Disk, you can also consider the following products

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

Pure Storage - Pure Storage is an all-flash enterprise storage solution that accelerate random I/O-intensive applications like server virtualization, deskt

Artifactory - The world’s most advanced repository manager.

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Azure Container Registry - Store images for all types of container deployments and OCI artifacts, using Azure Container Registry.

Nimble Storage - Nimble Storage provides storage infrastructure combined with predictive analytics.

Loading...