Software Alternatives & Startups

Google Cloud Spanner VS pREST

Compare Google Cloud Spanner VS pREST and see what are their differences

Google Cloud Spanner

Google Cloud Spanner is a horizontally scalable, globally consistent, relational database service.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
pREST

A fully RESTful API from any existing PostgreSQL database written in Go

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Google Cloud Spanner should be more popular than pREST. It has been mentioned 18 times since March 2021.

social mentions
18 vs 2
Databases popularity
79% vs 21%
alternatives listed
90 vs 36

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Google Cloud Spanner
pREST
Website cloud.google.com prestd.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Google Cloud Spanner 6 features
pREST 5 features
  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Spanner can automatically scale horizontally, providing robust support for large-scale applications. It can handle petabytes of data across millions of instances with ease.
  • Global Distribution
    Spanner enables globally distributed databases with strong consistency and low-latency reads, allowing applications to deliver seamless performance across the globe.
  • Strong Consistency
    Unlike many other distributed databases, Cloud Spanner offers strong transactional consistency, using Google's TrueTime API to ensure precise timestamp ordering that supports ACID transactions.
  • Fully Managed
    Cloud Spanner is a fully managed service, which means Google handles maintenance tasks such as updates, scaling, and provisioning, reducing the operational overhead for users.
  • SQL Support
    It provides support for SQL queries, making it easier for developers and teams familiar with SQL to integrate and manage their data workloads without needing to learn new paradigms.
  • High Availability
    Cloud Spanner is designed for high availability, with built-in redundancy and failover capabilities that ensure continuous operation even in the face of regional outages.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Google Cloud Spanner can be expensive compared to other database solutions, especially for smaller applications or startups with limited budgets.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    While growing, Spanner's ecosystem is not as mature as more established relational or NoSQL databases, which might lead to fewer third-party tools and integrations.
  • Complexity in Migration
    Migrating existing applications and data to Cloud Spanner can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those coming from non-relational database systems.
  • Limited NoSQL Features
    For applications that require specific NoSQL features, such as unstructured data handling and schema flexibility, Cloud Spanner may not be the best fit compared to other NoSQL databases.
  • Regional Lock-in
    Although it offers global distribution, data residency and compliance requirements might limit some organizations to specific regions, which can affect the strategic deployment of an application.
  • Easy Setup
    pREST offers a straightforward setup process, allowing developers to quickly integrate a RESTful API with PostgreSQL databases without extensive configuration or code.
  • Database-driven
    It leverages PostgreSQL's powerful features, enabling efficient and optimized queries directly from the database, which can improve performance and reduce the need for complex backend logic.
  • Auto-generated Endpoints
    pREST automatically generates RESTful endpoints based on your database schema, which speeds up development and reduces manual coding effort.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source allows developers to view, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a collaborative and transparent development environment.
  • Security Features
    It includes built-in security features such as authentication and permission management to safeguard data access and operations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Flexibility
    pREST's auto-generated endpoints may not provide the same level of customization and flexibility as a fully hand-coded API solution.
  • Dependency on PostgreSQL
    As it is designed specifically for PostgreSQL, it limits the choice of databases, and transitioning to another database system could require significant changes.
  • Community and Support
    Being a relatively newer tool, it might have a smaller community and fewer support resources compared to more established frameworks, which could affect troubleshooting and support.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For extremely large-scale applications, relying solely on auto-generated endpoints might pose scalability challenges without additional optimization and infrastructure support.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with RESTful principles or PostgreSQL might encounter a learning curve in understanding how pREST integrates both to provide its functionalities.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Google Cloud Spanner 1 video + Add
pREST 3 videos + Add

Build with Google Cloud Spanner

etrailer | Prest-O-Fit Interior Landing RV Step Rug Review

More videos

  • - Review of Prest-O-Fit RV Step Covers - 3-Piece Chocolate Brown Exterior RV Step Rugs - PR82MR
  • - etrailer | Prest-O-Fit Adapter for RV Sewer Hose Review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Google Cloud Spanner
pREST
79% 79%
21% 21%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Spanner and pREST. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Google Cloud Spanner 18 mentions
pREST 2 mentions
  • SQL vs. NoSQL — stop asking the wrong question
    Also false. Postgres runs massive production workloads, and you'll hit product problems long before it's your bottleneck. And when you genuinely outgrow a single node, distributed SQL exists now — CockroachDB, Google Cloud Spanner, and... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Golden Ticket To Explore Google Cloud
    Multiregion is possible in Google Cloud using Cloud Spanner, which allows you to replicate the database not only in multiple zones but also in multiple regions as defined in the instance configuration. The replicas allow you to read data... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • /u/ryuuthecat wonders how a feature of google maps works. Engineer who programmed the feature responds with the answer
    Basically everything I touch is in-house, but a majority of it is available publicly. For instance: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

  • Accessing Postgres via REST using pRest
    With pRest, it is possible to create a RESTFul API to access the contents of a Postgres database in a fast and straightforward way. The project, written in Go, can be found on its official website and Github. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
  • Admin panel for Go back end?
    So this is something I've been pondering about for a while and I think I've settled to using Directus: https://directus.io/ as my db admin and dbmate for migrations. Alternatively you could use react admin:... Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to Google Cloud Spanner and pREST

When comparing Google Cloud Spanner and pREST, you can also consider the following products.