Go Button VS cppq

• User-Friendly Interface
  Go Button offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all experience levels to manage their events and shows.
• Reliable Playback
  The app provides reliable audio playback capabilities, ensuring that each track plays smoothly without interruptions, which is crucial during live performances.
• Flexible Cue Management
  Go Button allows for comprehensive cue management, enabling users to set up, organize, and play their audio cues easily and in a flexible manner.
• Cross-Platform Availability
  It's available on multiple platforms, ensuring that users can access and use the app across various devices, increasing its versatility and reach.
• Customizable Settings
  The app offers a variety of customizable settings, allowing users to tailor the experience according to the specific needs of their event or performance.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Free Features
  While Go Button offers a free version, some users might find the features limited and may feel compelled to purchase the premium version for full functionality.
• Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  Though generally user-friendly, mastering all the advanced features and settings may require some time and effort, particularly for users not familiar with cue-based software.
• Compatibility Issues
  Some users have reported compatibility issues with certain devices or operating systems, which can hinder the app's usability and overall effectiveness.
• Performance on Older Devices
  The app may not perform optimally on older devices, potentially leading to slower response times or crashes during critical moments.
• Resource Intensive
  Go Button can be resource-intensive, necessitating high processing power, which could be a drawback for users with limited device capabilities.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

No analysis of Go Button yet.

Go Button | App Review

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Tech illiterate seeks halp

  I would use Go Button from Figure 53 (only works on Apple devices) for your playback. Free if you only are doing one show. Works with a variety of remotes, which you could sew into your costume or something. Turn-key solution and rock... Source: over 4 years ago

• App for tracks on ipad

  Go Button, by the same people who make QLab. Good enough that I've run a couple of simple shows on it. Source: almost 5 years ago

• Possible to use Android tablet for live backing tracks, and control with MIDI?

  My usual suggestion would be gobutton but it's iOS only. I'd be surprised that you couldn't use some similar keywords to come up with an Android app. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.