Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Screen VS mtm

Compare GNU Screen VS mtm and see what are their differences

GNU Screen logo GNU Screen

Screen is a full-screen window manager that multiplexes a physical terminal between several...

mtm logo mtm

Perhaps the smallest useful terminal multiplexer in the world.
  • GNU Screen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • mtm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

GNU Screen features and specs

  • Session Management
    GNU Screen allows you to detach and reattach sessions, making it possible to keep applications running in the background even if you disconnect from a terminal session.
  • Multiple Windows
    It provides the ability to open multiple windows within a single terminal session, allowing you to manage different tasks concurrently without opening additional shell instances.
  • Terminal Sharing
    Screen supports terminal sharing, enabling multiple users to view and interact with the same terminal session, which is useful for collaborative work and troubleshooting.
  • Scrollback History
    You have access to scrollback history, allowing you to review command output and logs even after they've disappeared from view in the normal terminal.
  • Customizability
    GNU Screen provides extensive options for customization through its configuration file, enabling users to tailor keybindings, appearances, and functionalities to their preferences.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Being a text-based application, GNU Screen is extremely light on system resources, making it suitable for use on systems with limited computational power or memory.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Screen

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find GNU Screen's interface and command syntax difficult to learn and use efficiently, especially without dedicated tutorials or documentation.
  • Outdated User Interface
    Compared to more modern terminal multiplexers like tmux, GNU Screen may feel outdated in terms of user interfaces and ease of use.
  • Limited Functionality
    While robust for basic session management, GNU Screen lacks some of the advanced functionalities and features found in newer tools, such as better scripting integrations and extended multi-pane support.
  • Configuration Complexity
    The process of configuring the .screenrc file to achieve certain custom setups can be cumbersome and unintuitive for some users.
  • Competition from Alternatives
    Alternatives like tmux offer similar functionalities with more modern features, resulting in a decline in the usage of GNU Screen among new users.

mtm features and specs

  • Lightweight
    MTM is a minimal terminal multiplexer, so it consumes significantly less memory and resources compared to more feature-rich multiplexers like tmux or screen.
  • Simplicity
    MTM has a simple design with fewer features, making it easy to use for basic session management without getting overwhelmed by options.
  • Fast Setup
    Due to its minimalistic nature, MTM is easy and quick to set up, requiring minimal configuration to start using.

Possible disadvantages of mtm

  • Limited Features
    MTM lacks many of the advanced features found in other multiplexer tools, such as scripting capabilities and plugin support, which might be essential for some users.
  • Basic Interface
    The interface of MTM is quite basic and may not be as user-friendly or visually appealing as other multiplexers that offer more customization and layout options.
  • Community and Support
    Being a lesser-known tool, MTM might have a smaller community and fewer resources for troubleshooting issues compared to more popular terminal multiplexers.

GNU Screen videos

GNU Screen

mtm videos

iLoud MTM _(Z Reviews)_ These Make Me Cry 💦💦

More videos:

  • Review - BEST SMALL STUDIO MONITORS?! – iLOUD MTM Review
  • Review - MTM TMag Can Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Screen and mtm)
SSH
54 54%
46% 46
Terminal Tools
54 54%
46% 46
Uptime Monitoring
45 45%
55% 55
Server Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Screen and mtm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mtm seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Screen mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Screen yet. Tracking of GNU Screen recommendations started around Mar 2021.

mtm mentions (3)

  • Building off the linux kernel
    You can try looking at projects like mtm to get an idea of what is needed. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Zellij – A Terminal Workspace and Multiplexer Written in Rust
    Besides tmux you can also try * mtm: https://github.com/deadpixi/mtm. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
  • Any mtm hackers?
    I have been using tmux for a while, and to be frank it is not that great. I constantly have issues with the copy and paste modes, it always spawns a session handler which I often don't want, it is all around pain in the ass. I tried using dvtm for a while, but in the terminal, I tend to prefer a more free flow and manual pane management-style. Doing some research I found a multiplexor called mtm which seems to be... Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Screen and mtm, you can also consider the following products

tmux - tmux is a terminal multiplexer: it enables a number of terminals (or windows), each running a...

Zellij - A terminal workspace with batteries included

byobu - Byobu is a GPLv3 open source text-based window manager and terminal multiplexer.

minicom - Minicom is a menu driven communications program. It emulates ANSI and VT102 terminals.

tmuxinator - Manage complex tmux sessions easily. Contribute to tmuxinator/tmuxinator development by creating an account on GitHub.

Wemux - wemux - Multi-User Tmux Made Easy