Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Emacs VS CMDBuild

Compare GNU Emacs VS CMDBuild and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GNU Emacs logo GNU Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editorโ€”and more.

CMDBuild logo CMDBuild

CMDBuild is a web enterprise environment designed for asset and database management. It's a favorite among enterprises that need an advanced and secure organization solution for a great deal of files and applications... read more.
  • GNU Emacs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-19
  • CMDBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-29

GNU Emacs features and specs

  • Highly Extensible
    GNU Emacs is highly customizable, allowing users to configure nearly every aspect using Emacs Lisp. This makes it remarkably adaptable for various workflows.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    There is a wide array of plugins available for Emacs, extending its functionality for programming, text editing, project management, and more.
  • Versatile
    Aside from text editing, Emacs can function as an email client, web browser, terminal emulator, and more, making it a powerful multi-purpose tool.
  • Free and Open Source
    GNU Emacs is free to use and modify, with source code available under the GNU General Public License, encouraging collaborative improvement and transparency.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Emacs runs on many different operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and various Unix-like systems, ensuring a wide reach and consistent experience across platforms.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Emacs

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its vast array of features and unique keybindings, new users often find Emacs difficult to learn initially.
  • Performance
    Emacs can be slower compared to more lightweight text editors, especially when heavily customized or handling large files.
  • Keyboard-Centric Interface
    Emacs relies heavily on keyboard shortcuts, which can be overwhelming and complex, leading to potential finger strain from extensive use.
  • Complex Configuration
    While its customizability is a strength, configuring Emacs to fit personal needs can be time-consuming and complex, requiring knowledge of Emacs Lisp.

CMDBuild features and specs

  • Flexibility
    CMDBuild is highly customizable, allowing organizations to adapt the system to their specific needs, including the creation of custom workflows and data models.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source solution, CMDBuild allows for a lower total cost of ownership and the ability to inspect and modify the source code as needed.
  • Active Community
    It benefits from an active community and continuous updates, ensuring that users have access to the latest features and support.
  • Integration Capabilities
    CMDBuild offers various integration possibilities with other enterprise applications, enhancing its utility in complex IT environments.
  • Web-based Interface
    Its web-based interface allows for easy access and management from any device with internet access, providing flexibility in operations.

Possible disadvantages of CMDBuild

  • Complexity
    The high level of customization also means that CMDBuild can be complex to configure and maintain, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise.
  • Initial Setup Time
    Setting up CMDBuild for the first time can be time-consuming and may require a considerable amount of effort for detailed configuration.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its flexibility and range of features, there can be a steep learning curve for new users, necessitating comprehensive training.
  • Performance
    Some users have reported performance issues when dealing with very large datasets, which may require additional optimization and hardware resources.
  • Support Limitations
    While there is an active community, official support might be limited or require a commercial agreement, which could be a drawback for some organizations.

Analysis of GNU Emacs

Overall verdict

  • GNU Emacs is widely considered to be a powerful and versatile text editor, especially among programmers and developers.

Why this product is good

  • Highly Customizable: Emacs can be extensively customized with Emacs Lisp, enabling users to tailor the editor to fit their specific workflow.
  • Rich Ecosystem: There is a large variety of plug-ins and extensions available, which can transform it into much more than just a text editor.
  • Built-in Tools: Emacs includes numerous built-in tools such as a debugger, calendar, email client, and file manager, making it a comprehensive development environment.
  • Cross-Platform: Emacs runs on multiple platforms, which makes it accessible to a broad audience.

Recommended for

  • Programmers and developers who appreciate a customizable and extensible tool.
  • Users who want to integrate various development tools into a single environment.
  • Individuals comfortable with learning Emacs Lisp to create and understand custom scripts and configurations.
  • People interested in a text editor that has a strong and supportive community.

Analysis of CMDBuild

Overall verdict

  • CMDBuild can be considered a good choice for organizations looking for a customizable and scalable solution to manage their configuration and change management needs. Its open-source nature avoids vendor lock-in, and its adaptability suits various organizational requirements. However, it requires a certain level of technical expertise to implement and maintain, which might be a consideration for some organizations.

Why this product is good

  • CMDBuild is a flexible open-source software designed for the management of enterprise assets and IT services. It offers powerful tools for creating and managing a configuration management database (CMDB), including advanced features like workflows, scheduling, reporting, and integration with other systems. Its flexibility and open-source nature allow organizations to customize it according to their specific needs, supporting a wide range of applications beyond traditional CMDB purposes.

Recommended for

  • Organizations seeking an open-source solution for configuration and asset management.
  • IT departments looking to integrate a flexible CMDB with existing ITIL processes.
  • Businesses requiring a customizable platform for managing complex IT environments.

GNU Emacs videos

Switching to GNU Emacs

CMDBuild videos

CMDBuild READY2USE Asset Management

More videos:

  • Review - CMDBuild vs CMDBuild REDY2USE - Webinar
  • Review - CMDBuild READY2USE quick overview

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Emacs and CMDBuild)
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Server Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Emacs and CMDBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GNU Emacs and CMDBuild

GNU Emacs Reviews

14 BEST LaTeX Editor for Mac & Windows in 2022
Emacs is a Unix based text editor tool which is used by programmers, engineers, students, and system administrators. It is one of the best LaTeX editor for Mac that allows you to add, modify, delete, insert, words, letters, lines, and other units of text.
Source: www.guru99.com
The Top 7 Notepad++ Alternatives for You
Emacs has been around in its various forms since 1976 and is another very worthy Notepad++ alternative. When I first started using Emacs I have to admit that I didnโ€™t find it the easiest to use. But once I got used to it I realized just how powerful Emacs is for the programming community.
10 Best Notepad++ Alternatives in 2020
Emacs is a Unix based text editor tool which is used by programmers, engineers, students, and system administrators. It allows you to add, modify, delete, insert, words, letters, lines, and other units of text.
Source: www.guru99.com
7 open source alternatives to Dreamweaver
Vim or Emacs. Without participating in the holy war between these two traditional text editors, I can safely say that there are a number of enhancements for web editing available for both. So if you're already a terminal junkie, take your pick. Or, if those don't satisfy, try one of these Emacs/Vim alternatives.
Source: opensource.com
10 Best Sublime Text Alternatives in 2019
Emacs is a Unix based text editor tool which is used by programmers, engineers, students, and system administrators. It allows you to add, modify, delete, insert, words, letters, lines, and other units of text.
Source: www.guru99.com

CMDBuild Reviews

We have no reviews of CMDBuild yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GNU Emacs seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Emacs mentions (6)

  • Emacs daemon as sytemd service in debian 12 (gnome)
    Cat .config/systemd/user/default.target.wants/emacs.service [Unit] Description=Emacs text editor Documentation=info:emacs man:emacs(1) https://gnu.org/software/emacs/ [Service] Type=notify ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/emacs --fg-daemon # Emacs will exit with status 15 after having received SIGTERM, which # is the default "KillSignal" value systemd uses to stop services. SuccessExitStatus=15 # The location of the... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Why does emacs exec path variable not just copy the users path variable?
    ## If your Emacs is installed in a non-standard location, you may need ## to copy this file to a standard directory, eg ~/.config/systemd/user/ . ## If you install this file by hand, change the "Exec" lines below ## to use absolute file names for the executables. [Unit] Description=Emacs text editor Documentation=info:emacs man:emacs(1)... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Hi DM's, what medium do you use to organise your campaign?
    For gathering notes, writing and organizing, Org-Roam which implies Org and Emacs. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • This Guy is getting out of control at this point.
    I was heading to gnu.org/software/emacs to prove my point and it said:. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • opam doesn't see emacs?
    <><> Version-specific details <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> ๐Ÿซ Version 1 Repository default Homepage: "http://gnu.org/software/emacs" Bug-reports: "https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/issues" Authors: "anil@recoil.org" Maintainer: "anil@recoil.org" License: "GPL-1.0-or-later" Flags: conf Synopsis Virtual package to install the Emacs editor Description This... Source: almost 5 years ago
View more

CMDBuild mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CMDBuild yet. Tracking of CMDBuild recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Emacs and CMDBuild, you can also consider the following products

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

KiTTY - KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

Console - Console is a Windows console window enhancement.

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more