Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNOME Terminal VS Boxes.dev

Compare GNOME Terminal VS Boxes.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GNOME Terminal logo GNOME Terminal

GNOME Terminal is a terminal emulator for GNOME desktop.

Boxes.dev logo Boxes.dev

Run Claude Code and Codex in your own cloud environment
  • GNOME Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-25
Not present

GNOME Terminal features and specs

  • User Friendly
    GNOME Terminal has a clean and intuitive interface that is easy to use, especially for new users.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize the appearance and behavior of the terminal, including themes, fonts, and profiles.
  • Tabs and Split Views
    Supports multiple tabs and split views, making it easier to manage multiple terminal sessions.
  • Integrations
    Seamlessly integrates with the GNOME desktop environment, providing a consistent look and feel.
  • Accessibility
    Offers support for assistive technologies, making it accessible to users with disabilities.
  • Scripting
    Can be extended and controlled using scripts for automation and advanced functionality.

Possible disadvantages of GNOME Terminal

  • Performance
    May not be as lightweight or fast as some other terminal emulators, especially on older hardware.
  • Dependency
    Highly dependent on the GNOME ecosystem, which may not be desirable for users of other desktop environments.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Lacks some advanced features found in other terminal emulators, such as extensive plugins or multi-pane tiling.
  • Resource Usage
    Consumes more system resources compared to minimalist terminal emulators, affecting performance on low-end systems.
  • Complex Customization
    Some customization options might be too complex for casual users and require manual editing of configuration files.

Boxes.dev features and specs

  • Instant macOS Development Environments
    Boxes.dev allows developers to quickly spin up macOS virtual machines for development purposes, significantly reducing the time needed to set up clean development environments compared to manual configuration.
  • Native Apple Silicon Support
    Boxes.dev is built to run natively on Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4) Macs, leveraging the Apple Virtualization framework for near-native performance without the overhead of traditional emulation.
  • Easy to Use Interface
    The app provides a streamlined, user-friendly interface for creating and managing macOS virtual machines, making virtualization accessible even to developers who aren't familiar with complex VM tooling.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    Boxes.dev offers the ability to create environments with development tools pre-installed or easily configurable, saving developers significant setup time when they need fresh or isolated macOS instances.
  • Snapshot and Restore Capabilities
    Users can take snapshots of their virtual machines and restore them to previous states, which is invaluable for testing, CI/CD workflows, and safely experimenting with system configurations without risk.

Possible disadvantages of Boxes.dev

  • macOS Only
    Boxes.dev is limited to macOS host machines and macOS guest VMs, making it unsuitable for developers who need to run Linux or Windows virtual machines or who work on non-Apple hardware.
  • Paid Software
    Boxes.dev is a commercial product that requires a purchase, which may be a barrier for individual developers or small teams, especially when free alternatives like UTM or raw QEMU exist.
  • Apple Silicon Requirement
    The app primarily targets Apple Silicon Macs, which means developers still using older Intel-based Macs may have limited functionality or may not be able to use the tool at all.
  • Relatively New Product
    As a relatively newer entrant in the virtualization space, Boxes.dev has a smaller community and fewer resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations compared to established tools like Parallels or VMware Fusion.
  • Limited OS Version Support
    Users are generally limited to running macOS versions that Apple's Virtualization framework supports as guests, which can restrict the ability to test on older macOS versions that may still be relevant for compatibility testing.

Analysis of GNOME Terminal

Overall verdict

  • GNOME Terminal is widely regarded as a solid choice for both beginners and advanced users who are working within the GNOME desktop environment. It balances simplicity with adequate functionality, making it a 'good' choice for most users.

Why this product is good

  • GNOME Terminal is a popular terminal emulator widely used within the GNOME desktop environment. It offers a straightforward and user-friendly interface along with extensive customization options. Users appreciate its support for multiple tabs, compatibility with modern technologies like VTE (Virtual Terminal Emulator) for advanced terminal capabilities, and integration with the GNOME ecosystem. The terminal is efficient for running commands, scripts, and various applications, while also providing necessary features like profile management and keyboard shortcuts.

Recommended for

  • GNOME desktop environment users
  • Users looking for a simple and reliable terminal emulator
  • People who need built-in support for multiple tabs and customizable profiles
  • Developers and system administrators who appreciate integration with GNOME settings and appearance

Analysis of Boxes.dev

Overall verdict

  • Boxes.dev appears to be a solid developer-focused tool that streamlines workflows, though its overall value depends on your specific technical needs and team size.

Why this product is good

  • Developer-centric design that integrates smoothly into existing coding workflows
  • Aims to reduce setup and configuration overhead so teams can focus on building
  • Modern, clean interface that appeals to technical users
  • Potential for improved collaboration and faster project spin-up

Recommended for

  • Software developers and engineering teams looking to simplify their tooling
  • Startups needing to move quickly with minimal infrastructure setup
  • Technical users who value streamlined, code-first workflows
  • Small to mid-sized teams seeking better collaboration on development projects

GNOME Terminal videos

185 GNOME Terminal Color Schemes - Gogh

Boxes.dev videos

No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNOME Terminal and Boxes.dev)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Server Management
100 100%
0% 0
AI
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNOME Terminal and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GNOME Terminal and Boxes.dev

GNOME Terminal Reviews

10 Termux Alternatives
GNOME Terminal is software with a terminal emulator that emulates xterm and provides the same features to the Linux environment and can access it from graphical desktops. This software is multiple profiles supported, and users can generate various shapes according to their needs and set specific configurations for each profile separately. This particular configuration can...
The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
GNOME terminal offers support for multiple profiles, which comes in handy if you need to set different profiles for different tasks. Its title bar nicely styles to match the GTK theme you might be using in your Linux distro. Another great feature I find interesting in the GNOME terminal is that it makes links clickable.
Top 14 Terminal Emulators for Linux (With Extra Features or Amazing Looks)
It basically provides you multiple GNOME terminals in one window. You can easily group and re-group terminal windows with the help of it. You may feel like using a tiling window manager but with some restrictions.
Source: itsfoss.com

Boxes.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Boxes.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Boxes.dev might be a bit more popular than GNOME Terminal. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to GNOME Terminal. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNOME Terminal mentions (2)

  • Are terminals written in the ncurses library?
    So far I have only seen information that ncurses is a package you would use to write applications for various terminals; what about the terminals themselves? Not only terminal emulators but the actual terminal of something like Ubuntu Server, which I believe to be gnome-terminal. Source: about 4 years ago
  • A good python library to replace libtcod for terminal play?
    Iterm2, gnome terminal, xterm, Konsole, macos Terminal, powershell, command, etc.. these all provide a common API which we normally use curses to interface with. But all of them basically reach into something lower level (opengl, vulkan, directx, etc.) to render the text, which ultimately is still pixels on a screen. Source: almost 5 years ago

Boxes.dev mentions (2)

  • Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
    Devin Automations is the most obvious one: solid UX, but can get very expensive to run. There are also a bunch of newer startups in this space. I'm building one myself, https://boxes.dev -- we're very early but building for this exact use case. Some other ones worth a look are Factory Droid and Amp Orbs. Those two build their own agent harness (like Cursor), whereas with boxes.dev we run the native codex and... - Source: Hacker News / 2 days ago
  • Mitchellh starts a new company: Superlogical
    These tools all assume you have machines to run the agents on. But for parallel agents I'm pretty convinced you want each agent on its own isolated devbox running your dev environment (not e.g. Worktrees on one box) - which isn't trivial to set up and manage. I'm working this with https://boxes.dev - a workspace for launching and managing claude + codex sessions, each running in its own cloud devbox. We launched... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNOME Terminal and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

Codesphere - Deploy in less than 5s

ConEmu - ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

AppWizzy - Build scalable web apps and websites with AI that serve you for years. Professional vibe-coding platform. Perfect to build SaaS, intenal tool, AI tool, business app, etc

PuTTY - Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

InstaVM - Instant computers for AI agents