
Contributions for GitHub
GitHub Metrics
GitHub Contributions
CodersRank
Superpowered
GitHub
GitHub Personal Website Generator
View/Share how you contributed to Github over the years

CodersRank
Libraries.io
star-history
GitHub Contributions
GitHub Metrics
One public page that adds up your npm, PyPI, VS Code and itch.io downloads and your GitHub stars, with a leaderboard and a README card. Free.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | gitwrapped.dev | auracheck.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of GitWrapped yet.
Your stars live on GitHub, your downloads on npm, your installs on the VS Code Marketplace, your games on itch.io. AuraCheck puts all of it on one public page. Sign in with GitHub (read-only) and in about 20 seconds you get: - Your totals across npm, PyPI, VS Code Marketplace + Open VSX, itch.io...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GitWrapped and auracheck.dev.
auracheck.dev's answer:
Next.js 16, TypeScript, PostgreSQL on Supabase with Drizzle, Vercel, and next/og (Satori) for the card images.
auracheck.dev's answer:
Free for every developer; no paying customers yet
auracheck.dev's answer:
Most developer stats tools look only at GitHub. AuraCheck adds up what you actually ship: downloads from npm, PyPI, VS Code Marketplace + Open VSX and itch.io, next to your GitHub stars, on one public page. And it only counts work you can prove is yours: a package adds to your score if its repo is yours or you verified the account that publishes it.
auracheck.dev's answer:
GitHub profile cards show commits and stars. AuraCheck shows reach: how many people download and install what you publish, across registries, refreshed daily. You get a public profile, a place on a leaderboard, a README card and badges, for free, with read-only GitHub sign-in. How the score is calculated is fully public.
auracheck.dev's answer:
Developers who publish things other people use: npm and PyPI packages, VS Code extensions, itch.io games and open source repos. Especially indie and open source maintainers who want one link that shows the reach of their work.
auracheck.dev's answer:
I'm a backend developer in Spain and I publish npm packages and VS Code extensions. Checking how they were doing meant opening npm, the Marketplace, Open VSX and GitHub one by one. So I built one page that adds it all up. It launched in October 2026 to my Spanish-speaking YouTube audience and is built and run by me alone.
Share your experience with using GitWrapped and auracheck.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing GitWrapped and auracheck.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Show your GitHub contributions graph on your iOS Devices
Compare Contributions for GitHub to GitWrapped or auracheck.dev:

The Ultimate Profile For Developers | Turn Your Code Into Your Digital Developer Profile & Get Hired Faster
Compare CodersRank to GitWrapped or auracheck.dev:

Customize your profile with various plugins and metrics
Compare GitHub Metrics to GitWrapped or auracheck.dev:

:books: The Open Source Discovery Service. Contribute to librariesio/libraries.io development by creating an account on GitHub.
Compare Libraries.io to GitWrapped or auracheck.dev:

All your GitHub contributions in one image
Compare GitHub Contributions to GitWrapped or auracheck.dev:

The missing star history graph of github repos
Compare star-history to GitWrapped or auracheck.dev: