Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

GitLive VS PuTTY

Compare GitLive VS PuTTY and see what are their differences

GitLive

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $7 / Monthly (per user)
Alternatives Is it good?
PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
warmup.rocks
warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, GitLive seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
3 vs 0
Code Collaboration popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
37 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

GitLive
PuTTY
Website git.live chiark.greenend.org.uk
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $7 / Monthly (per user) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Cross Platform
—
Listed in
Code Collaboration Software Development Software Development Tools Productivity IDE Developer Tools Code Review Communication +5
SSH Server Management Server Configuration And Automation Cloud Computing +1

About GitLive and PuTTY

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

GitLive
PuTTY

📣 The future of social coding Connect. ◾️See when your fellow contributors are online and which repos, branches and files they are working on. Automated. ◾️Connect your issue tracker to share what issue you are working on based on your current branch. 📣 Resolve conflicts before they happen Live....

Read more about GitLive

No description of PuTTY yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

GitLive 3 features
PuTTY 5 features
  • Real time collaboration
  • Communication & Notifications
  • Code Editor
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

GitLive
PuTTY

No analysis of GitLive yet.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

GitLive 1 video + Add
PuTTY 3 videos + Add

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
GitLive
PuTTY
100% 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0%
0% 0%
SSH
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Server Management
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using GitLive and PuTTY. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

GitLive no reviews yet
PuTTY no reviews yet

We have no reviews of GitLive yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

GitLive 3 mentions
PuTTY 0 mentions
  • Building Remote Teams for Startups
    There are plenty of tools that have started popping up to try and improve this situation since last year. CodeTogether, Duckly, Code With Me, and GitLive to name a few. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Dev resources and articles plus news from Huawei's Android alternative HarmonyOS, Mozilla launches MDN Plus, and more.
    GitLive. Extend your IDE with the real-time features remote development teams need to work together effectively. See what your teammates are working on and get notified of merge conflicts before you commit. Make video calls and code... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
  • Closest too to intellij conflict resolution?
    This is in no way an answer to your question but perhaps you would find git.live's merge conflict detection feature useful to potentially avoid the conflicts in the first place 😅. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to GitLive and PuTTY

When comparing GitLive and PuTTY, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...