
GitHub
BitBucket
Jira
Gitea
SourceForge
Gogs
Redmine
Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

BuiltWith
StackScan
Wappalyzer
Stackshare
Side Project Stack
StackHive
Stacks.co
Plan a stack, check the one you have, or compare two tools — from what 6,571 makers' products actually use, with sources, and what each costs at your scale.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitLab seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 145 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | about.gitlab.com | howmakersbuild.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States · 1,000 - 1,999 employees · 2014 | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
GitLab is well-suited for developers, DevOps engineers, project managers, and teams that require robust CI/CD capabilities, strong security features, and an open-source platform that can be self-hosted or used as a cloud service. It is particularly beneficial for organizations looking for a comprehensive solution to streamline their development workflows.
No analysis of How Makers Build yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Introduction to GitLab Workflow
More videos
No How Makers Build videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GitLab and How Makers Build.
How Makers Build's answer:
Every "used by" on the site links to a source you can open — a maker's own words, the product's public code, its website and DNS, its subprocessor list or its job postings — strongest evidence first. It is organised by decision (database, auth, hosting, payments, LLM APIs …), not by vendor, and prices each option at your scale.
How Makers Build's answer:
StackShare relies on stacks people declare themselves; BuiltWith and Wappalyzer only see what a browser loads and are built for sales prospecting. How Makers Build combines detection with makers' own words, code and legal disclosures, shows which tools products like yours chose for each decision, what they cost at launch, traction and scale, and which way developers are switching. Free, no sign-up.
How Makers Build's answer:
Indie makers, solo founders and small teams (under ten people) building a web SaaS or AI app, choosing or re-checking their stack.
How Makers Build's answer:
Astro (static site), TypeScript and Zod; a Node.js data pipeline that collects evidence from Product Hunt, GitHub, websites and DNS, subprocessor lists and job boards; hosted on Cloudflare Pages.
Share your experience with using GitLab and How Makers Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


GitLab’s in-context testing solution simplifies the development process by automating both application and infrastructure management on a single platform.Why We Picked GitLab: We like GitLab’s automation of testing...
GitLab is a web-based DevSecOps (take that, Call of Duty) platform that allows software development teams to plan, build, and ship secure code all in one application. GitLab offers a range of features and tools to...
CI/CD GitLab, as a complete DevOps platform, provides an integrated CI/CD solution along with its other features. If your team is already using GitLab for controlling versions and managing projects, the addition of...
We have no reviews of How Makers Build yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


So now choosing free git server from a vary short list of options. Bonobo Gogs vs Gitea vs Gitlab. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
We use GitHub here as an example, but there are also other hosts you could explore like GitLab and BitBucket. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Expertise. The SaaS provider is declaring: "I am good at XYZ; I can deliver it better than any of my competitors, and I constantly work to improve how I deliver it." Who do you think can better run GitLab, your already overworked... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Tracking How Makers Build since Oct 2026.
When comparing GitLab and How Makers Build, you can also consider the following products.

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to GitLab or How Makers Build:


Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to GitLab or How Makers Build:

Discover the tech behind the web. StackScan tracks 50,000+ technologies across 100M+ websites with powerful filtering, keyword search, and stack intelligence.
Compare StackScan to GitLab or How Makers Build:

The #1 software development tool used by agile teams. Jira Software is built for every member of your software team to plan, track, and release great software.
Compare Jira to GitLab or How Makers Build:

Wappalyzer is a technology profilers and leads data provider. Create lists of websites and contacts that use certain technologies.
Compare Wappalyzer to GitLab or How Makers Build: