
GitLab
GitHub
BitBucket
CircleCI
Gitea
Jenkins
Jira
SourceForge
Buck
GNU Make
npm
SCons
Ender
JSHint
Meson
MakeMe
GitLab
BuckGitLab is well-suited for developers, DevOps engineers, project managers, and teams that require robust CI/CD capabilities, strong security features, and an open-source platform that can be self-hosted or used as a cloud service. It is particularly beneficial for organizations looking for a comprehensive solution to streamline their development workflows.
Based on our record, GitLab seems to be a lot more popular than Buck. While we know about 144 links to GitLab, we've tracked only 9 mentions of Buck. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
We use GitHub here as an example, but there are also other hosts you could explore like GitLab and BitBucket. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Expertise. The SaaS provider is declaring: "I am good at XYZ; I can deliver it better than any of my competitors, and I constantly work to improve how I deliver it." Who do you think can better run GitLab, your already overworked Operations team, or GitLab itself? - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Integration Capabilities: How easily does it plug into your daily workflow? Look for deep integrations with your IDE, source control (like GitHub or GitLab), and especially your CI/CD pipeline. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Connect your GitLab account for seamless version control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Web Check CI stands out because it is the first CI/CD module of its kind available for GitLab! It's built on Google's Baseline initiative, the new standard for web platform compatibility. Instead of guessing which features are safe to use, developers get authoritative answers based on real browser support data. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Many big companies have built their own tools to reign in this complexity and make it easier and faster for developers to work on large, multi-language code bases. Meta has buck, Amazon has brazil, and Google has bazel. But from my experience, especially, with brazil, these tools also have some rough edges, so understanding how they work can go a long way. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I canโt just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target โopaqueโ - Buck wouldnโt have any knowledge of my appโs build graph so Iโd lose many of the benefits it... Source: about 3 years ago
Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: about 4 years ago
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
npm - npm is a package manager for Node.
CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.
SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction toolโthat is, a next-generation build tool.